>From the symbolic unit of the department...
Hello Tom,
26.04.2020 22:13, Tom Lane wrote:
> In the department of nitpickery ...
>
> "π" renders poorly in our PDF docs: as shown in the attached
> screenshot, it doesn't line up on the baseline. I realized that
> this is the same problem I'd run int
ne 26. 4. 2020 v 21:25 odesílatel yigong hu napsal:
> Sorry to hijack the thread, I also recently have similar observation that
> the statement about random_page_cost on SSD is ambiguous. The current
> document says that
>
> > Storage that has a low random read cost relative to sequential, e.g.
>
Sorry to hijack the thread, I also recently have similar observation that
the statement about random_page_cost on SSD is ambiguous. The current
document says that
> Storage that has a low random read cost relative to sequential, e.g.
solid-state drives, might also be better modeled with a lower va
In the department of nitpickery ...
"π" renders poorly in our PDF docs: as shown in the attached
screenshot, it doesn't line up on the baseline. I realized that
this is the same problem I'd run into recently with right-arrow,
and it can be solved in the same way, namely we have to specify
use of
Pavel Borisov writes:
> This patch little bit clarifies parsing of operators websearch_to_tqsuery()
> function
I pushed a version of this. Thanks for noticing the omission.
regards, tom lane
Thank you Jonathan.
Yes good thinking on a thorough way, I may need to go down that route.
I hadn't considered entries that exist in new versions but have
changed name or URL, glad to hear these might be handled well on the
docs themselves soon. I'll consider how to avoid getting in the way
there.
