Hello Tom,
12.02.2020 00:51, Tom Lane wrote:
> The crummy formatting of our tables of functions and operators has
> been an issue for a long time. To my mind, there are several things
> that need to be addressed:
>
> * The layout is completely unfriendly to function descriptions that
> run to more
On 2/11/20 3:49 PM, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
> On 2/11/20 3:41 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 11:40 AM Jonathan S. Katz
>> wrote:
>>> Anyway, attached is a first attempt at a patch. I tried a few different
>>> variations but in my quick review of it, I could not figure out h
The crummy formatting of our tables of functions and operators has
been an issue for a long time. To my mind, there are several things
that need to be addressed:
* The layout is completely unfriendly to function descriptions that
run to more than a few words.
* It's not very practical to have mo
On 2/11/20 3:41 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 11:40 AM Jonathan S. Katz
> wrote:
>> Anyway, attached is a first attempt at a patch. I tried a few different
>> variations but in my quick review of it, I could not figure out how to
>> make a XSLT respect having multiple style
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 11:40 AM Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
> Anyway, attached is a first attempt at a patch. I tried a few different
> variations but in my quick review of it, I could not figure out how to
> make a XSLT respect having multiple stylesheets (likely due to my lack
> of familiarity with
On 2/11/20 2:32 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Jonathan S. Katz" writes:
>> On 2/11/20 1:37 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I also wonder why duplicating the website's style isn't the default.
>>> Doesn't seem like having authors optimize for some other style is
>>> what we really want.
>
>> Oh, and specifically
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 10:37 AM Tom Lane wrote:
> I also wonder why duplicating the website's style isn't the default.
> Doesn't seem like having authors optimize for some other style is
> what we really want.
FWIW, I've often wondered about it myself.
--
Peter Geoghegan
"Jonathan S. Katz" writes:
> On 2/11/20 1:37 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I also wonder why duplicating the website's style isn't the default.
>> Doesn't seem like having authors optimize for some other style is
>> what we really want.
> Oh, and specifically for this, my guess is because it requires on
On 2/11/20 1:37 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I also wonder why duplicating the website's style isn't the default.
> Doesn't seem like having authors optimize for some other style is
> what we really want.
Oh, and specifically for this, my guess is because it requires one to
make a call over a network to
On 2/11/20 1:37 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I'm wondering how to do $SUBJECT. The fine manual suggests
>
> make STYLE=website html
>
> but what I'm getting here with that is not a very close approximation
> of what I see at postgresql.org. It's closer than the default,
> but it's not the same f
I'm wondering how to do $SUBJECT. The fine manual suggests
make STYLE=website html
but what I'm getting here with that is not a very close approximation
of what I see at postgresql.org. It's closer than the default,
but it's not the same font, margins, etc.
I also wonder why duplicatin
11 matches
Mail list logo
