On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 11:22:20AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2019-Nov-27, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>
> > > On 26 Nov 2019, at 19:28, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >
> > > Or perhaps we can add a second line in the example cell for the
> > > @@ operator, to make it clear that both forms can be
I looked into this report. When we do a CREATE or ALTER sequence, we
check that the new sequence row is valid. We don't track which values
were changed by ALTER, which is why you are seeing this kind of error
message wording. I don't think it is worth tracking this to generate
clearer error me
