Re: bgwriter_lru_multiplier maximum value

2019-04-01 Thread Michael Paquier
On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 03:09:39PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > If we are going to change it, the minimum value is apparently 0, not > 2. Ditto. I misread guc.c. -- Michael signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Responsive images in pgweb docs

2019-04-01 Thread Jonathan S. Katz
On 4/1/19 8:22 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 2019-04-01 13:23, Jonathan S. Katz wrote: >>> Image scaling is currently intentionally disabled for the HTML output >>> (see ignore.image.scaling in stylesheet-html-common.xsl). But if we >>> turn it on, then the images will automatically be huge if

Re: bgwriter_lru_multiplier maximum value

2019-04-01 Thread Chris Wilson
Hi all, We do document the range for some parameters: - bgwriter_flush_after: "The valid range is between 0, which disables forced writeback, and 2MB." - effective_io_concurrency (integer): "The allowed range is 1 to 1000, or zero to disable issuance of asynchronous I/O requests."

Re: bgwriter_lru_multiplier maximum value

2019-04-01 Thread Tom Lane
Michael Paquier writes: > On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 10:27:13AM +, PG Doc comments form wrote: >> The server has an undocumented maximum value of 10 for >> bgwriter_lru_multiplier, and will fail to start if it's set higher than >> this: > Any opinions from others? I don't think it's generally o

Re: bgwriter_lru_multiplier maximum value

2019-04-01 Thread Michael Paquier
On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 10:27:13AM +, PG Doc comments form wrote: > The server has an undocumented maximum value of 10 for > bgwriter_lru_multiplier, and will fail to start if it's set higher than > this: > > LOG: 20 is outside the valid range for parameter "bgwriter_lru_multiplier" > (0 .. 1

bgwriter_lru_multiplier maximum value

2019-04-01 Thread PG Doc comments form
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/11/runtime-config-resource.html Description: The server has an undocumented maximum value of 10 for bgwriter_lru_multiplier, and will fail to start if it's set higher than this: LOG: 20 is

Re: Responsive images in pgweb docs

2019-04-01 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 2019-04-01 13:23, Jonathan S. Katz wrote: >> Image scaling is currently intentionally disabled for the HTML output >> (see ignore.image.scaling in stylesheet-html-common.xsl). But if we >> turn it on, then the images will automatically be huge if you have large >> screen. Is that better? > >

Re: Responsive images in pgweb docs

2019-04-01 Thread Jonathan S. Katz
On 4/1/19 5:57 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 2019-03-31 16:23, Jonathan S. Katz wrote: >> When testing the rendering of the images on the pgweb docs, I discovered >> that they are not responsive (see attached) and in its current state, >> basically makes any page that loads an image significantl

Re: Responsive images in pgweb docs

2019-04-01 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 2019-03-31 16:23, Jonathan S. Katz wrote: > When testing the rendering of the images on the pgweb docs, I discovered > that they are not responsive (see attached) and in its current state, > basically makes any page that loads an image significantly more > challenging to read on mobile. Image s

Re: Missing pg_seetings catalog name in table 49.1

2019-04-01 Thread Daniel Gustafsson
On Monday, April 1, 2019 8:33 AM, PG Doc comments form wrote: > The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: > > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/catalogs-overview.html > Description: > > Table 49.1 on https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/catalogs-overview.html > l

Missing pg_seetings catalog name in table 49.1

2019-04-01 Thread PG Doc comments form
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/catalogs-overview.html Description: Table 49.1 on https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/catalogs-overview.html list system catalog. pg_seetings is not listed in the table.