On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 09:45:49AM +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
>> Tatsuo Ishii writes:
>> I think it's a safe bet at this point that that feature isn't ever
>> coming back, so I'd be good with ripping out the whole para.
>
> Ok, I will remove the comment in all supported branches (after next
> min
> Tatsuo Ishii writes:
>> There's a comment beginning with:
>>
>> in rules.sgml around line 2437. It seems this has been there since 2003.
>> Do we need to keep this?
>
> Well, the point is that the whole para after that is commented out.
Yes, so my question was we could safely remove the whole
Tatsuo Ishii writes:
> There's a comment beginning with:
>
> in rules.sgml around line 2437. It seems this has been there since 2003.
> Do we need to keep this?
Well, the point is that the whole para after that is commented out.
The para in question seems to have shown up in 20a071326, and
at t
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 8:25 AM PG Doc comments form
wrote:
> At https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/tutorial-sql-intro.html it is
> written:
> $ cd /src/tutorial
> The four dots are not valid, either remove two of them or replace all four
> with proper path such as ../..
Your solutions are
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/tutorial-sql-intro.html
Description:
At https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/tutorial-sql-intro.html it is
written:
$ cd /src/tutorial
$ make
---
$ cd /tutorial
$ psql -s mydb
The
There's a comment beginning with:
in rules.sgml around line 2437. It seems this has been there since 2003.
Do we need to keep this?
Best regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp
