The following bug has been logged on the website:
Bug reference: 8410
Logged by: Terje Elde
Email address: te...@elde.net
PostgreSQL version: Unsupported/Unknown
Operating system: FreeBSD
Description:
Running:
PostgreSQL 9.3beta1 on amd64-portbld-freebsd9.1
xpect it to behave more as an insert
on cars.
Terje
On Jul 24, 2013, at 2:37 PM, Terje Elde wrote:
> Short summary:
> If I run a single INSERT against an updateable VIEW on top of a partitioned
> table, it's run against all the tables/partitions. I'd expect that with
> UPDATE and DELETE, but not with INSERT. Result
xpect it to behave more as an insert
on cars.
Terje
plifying (wildcard usernames,
etc), look at other authentication-systems (PAM), or set up a build-sytem for
pg_hba.
Terje
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
On Aug 30, 2013, at 11:23 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Sounds like a bug all right, but I'm not convinced it explains Terje's
> report. The thing this theory doesn't explain is why would Terje be
> having trouble reproducing the failure? Seems like re-running the same
> quer
On Aug 30, 2013, at 10:46 PM, te...@elde.net wrote:
> The following bug has been logged on the website:
That didn't work out too well, rendering-wize.
Sending the explain analyze by email as well, hoping it'll be more readable:
On 30. aug. 2013, at 23:05, Andres Freund wrote:
> No need, found the bug. And I think can build a testcase myself.
Sounds good. :)
Please do let me know if there's anything I can do.
Terje
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes
On Aug 30, 2013, at 11:49 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> Even better explanation: The merge append is some steps below a LockRows
> node, so the number of rescans might depend on the concurrency because
> we'll do the EvalPlanQual dance on a concurrent row update.
>
> Te
if I can set up some synthetic load to provoke the error more rapidly,
then patch and re-check.
It's getting quite late, and has been a bit of a long day, so it'll
unfortunately have to wait until tomorrow I think, sorry. :(
Terje
when executing any VOLATILE function?
If a volatile function checks the bit, and you're "inside" a stable function,
you could then raise an exception for calling volatile inside stable?
Terje
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
11 matches
Mail list logo
