Re: [BUGS] 7.4beta4: make check broken?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > ljb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I got the same error with beta1, but the symbol was "get_progname" >> not "get_proname". Perhaps the above is a typo. > > "get_progname" would make sense, because that's a

Re: [BUGS] 7.4beta4: make check broken?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Yeah, we have seen this before on various platforms. On some, > LD_LIBRARY_PATH isn't actually anything the dynamic linker pays > attention to, and on others, it is trumped by the installation rpath > built into the executables. Not putting an rpath into the executables

[BUGS] pgtcl large object read/write corrupts binary data

[Using PostgreSQL-7.3.4 and -7.4beta5, Tcl-8.4.x.] Binary data written to a Large Object with libpgtcl's pg_lo_write is corrupted. Tcl is mangling the data - something to do with UTF-8 conversion. Example: 0x80 becomes 0xc2 0x80, and 0xff becomes 0xc3 0xbf. The problem with pg_lo_read is more s

Re: [BUGS] Failure in "make check" with 7.4RC2

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Wolfgang Drotschmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> relocation error: >> /home/drotschm/.Installation/postgresql-7.4RC2/src/test/regress/./tmp_check/install//PostgreSQL//bin/createdb: >> >> undefined symbol: get_progname >> pg_regress: createdb failed > > Hmm. get_pro