[BUGS] BUG #4843: non standard use string literal warning in RAISE WARNING

2009-06-08 Thread Regina
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 4843 Logged by: Regina Email address: l...@pcorp.us PostgreSQL version: 8.4beta2 Operating system: Windows Description:non standard use string literal warning in RAISE WARNING Details: I'm not sure if th

[BUGS] BUG #4860: Indexes gone after restore

2009-06-18 Thread Regina
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 4860 Logged by: Regina Email address: robe@cityofboston.gov PostgreSQL version: 8.4rc1 Operating system: Windows Description:Indexes gone after restore Details: This I think is an issue with prior

[BUGS] BUG #5007: could not reattach to shared memory

2009-08-24 Thread Regina
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 5007 Logged by: Regina Email address: l...@pcorp.us PostgreSQL version: 8.3.6 Operating system: Windows 2008 Server Standard Description:could not reattach to shared memory Details: One of our clients is

[BUGS] BUG #6053: Can't do DISTINCT on citext column

2011-06-05 Thread Regina
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 6053 Logged by: Regina Email address: l...@pcorp.us PostgreSQL version: 9.1beta1 Operating system: Windows Description:Can't do DISTINCT on citext column Details: I have a table I created like this: --

[BUGS] BUG #4567: Clustering on GIST INDEX clobbers records in table intermittently

2008-12-07 Thread Regina Obe
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 4567 Logged by: Regina Obe Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PostgreSQL version: 8.3.5 Operating system: Numerous Description:Clustering on GIST INDEX clobbers records in table intermittently Details: This

Re: [BUGS] BUG #4567: Clustering on GIST INDEX clobbers records in table intermittently

2008-12-07 Thread Obe, Regina
"Regina Obe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Description:Clustering on GIST INDEX clobbers records in table > intermittently > This doesn't always happen to me but does intermittently, and for others it > happens all the time. > I wonder whether this i

Re: [BUGS] BUG #4860: Indexes gone after restore

2009-06-18 Thread Obe, Regina
they have similar issues or if its just something about my config. Thanks, Regina -Original Message- From: Tom Lane [mailto:t...@sss.pgh.pa.us] Sent: Thu 6/18/2009 12:53 PM To: Obe, Regina Cc: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #4860: Indexes gone after restore &q

Re: [BUGS] BUG #4860: Indexes gone after restore

2009-06-18 Thread Obe, Regina
schema issue in restore. -Original Message- From: Tom Lane [mailto:t...@sss.pgh.pa.us] Sent: Thu 6/18/2009 1:59 PM To: Obe, Regina Cc: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #4860: Indexes gone after restore "Obe, Regina" writes: > Your example seems to work fin

Re: [BUGS] BUG #4860: Indexes gone after restore

2009-06-18 Thread Obe, Regina
> Hum. So the immediate problem is that st_transform() is failing to > schema-qualify its reference to spatial_ref_sys. Think you need to > be filing that one against PostGIS, not us. Yah was sort of thinking that. Though what about this -- isn't this case a bit more common http://postgis.re

[BUGS] ERROR: XX000: function 60821C60 returned NULL

2007-01-02 Thread Obe, Regina
ER TO robedev; GRANT ALL ON TABLE hbasessionsremaining TO robedev; GRANT ALL ON TABLE hbasessionsremaining TO dnddtsadmins WITH GRANT OPTION; Thanks, Regina - The substance of this message, including any attachments, may be confidential, legal

Re: [BUGS] ERROR: XX000: function 60821C60 returned NULL

2007-01-02 Thread Obe, Regina
Correction upgrade to PG 8.2 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Obe, Regina Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 12:36 PM To: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org Subject: [BUGS] ERROR: XX000: function 60821C60 returned NULL I have an SQL job on SQL