Re: [BUGS] JDBC: HELP!!! Can't Upload BLOBS on 6.5.3

2000-10-03 Thread Peter Mount
On Tue, 3 Oct 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Angel Leon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) reports a bug with a severity of 1 > The lower the number the more severe it is. > > Short Description > JDBC: HELP!!! Can't Upload BLOBS on 6.5.3 > > Long Description At First I tried the PreparedStatement > "setBinar

Re: [BUGS] JDBC & XML-DBMS

2000-10-17 Thread Peter Mount
On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Alexander Yurov wrote: > 1. JDBC Driver returns empty separator in the database catalog. In the source I have the following comment: // PM Sep 29 97 - changed from "." as we don't support catalogs. So back in 1997 I removed the "." > 2. Why JDBC Driver returns column (proc

Re: [BUGS] JDBC Driver Authentication Bug

2001-01-13 Thread Peter Mount
Sorry for the delay. What is the setting in pg_hba.conf? It sounds like this is set to trust which would produce this affect. Peter - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2000 4:04 AM Subject: [BUGS] JDBC Driver Authentication

Re: [JDBC] [BUGS] no way in LargeObject API to detect short read?

2001-01-30 Thread Peter Mount
At 01:58 14/11/00 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Paul M. Aoki ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) reports a bug with a severity of 3 >The lower the number the more severe it is. > >Short Description >no way in LargeObject API to detect short read? > >Long Description >org.postgresql.largeobject.LargeObject.read

Re: [BUGS] JDBC ResultSet.getObject() fails for type INTERVAL

2001-02-03 Thread Peter Mount
At 00:01 02/02/01 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >John Lemcke ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) reports a bug with a severity of 2 >The lower the number the more severe it is. > >Short Description >JDBC ResultSet.getObject() fails for type INTERVAL > >Long Description >Trying to retrieve an INTERVAL from a Res

Re: [BUGS] jdbc1 compile problem still present in beta5 (java 1.1.8/freebsd 4.2-STABLE)

2001-03-01 Thread Peter Mount
At 10:23 01/03/01 -0500, Nat Howard wrote: >Also, there's one I don't remember involving PGclob.java -- perhaps it's new? There's a few JDBC1.2/JDK1.1 problems in there, but I can't fix until I get JDK1.1.8 reinstalled here. PGclob is new for the JDBC2.x driver, so the build.xml file is missing

Re: [BUGS] select problem

2001-03-01 Thread Peter Mount
At 13:37 01/03/01 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Elie Atallah ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) reports a bug with a severity of 2 >The lower the number the more severe it is. > >Short Description >select problem > >Long Description >I'm using JDBC as an interface. > >The select query will be dynamicly built.

Re: [BUGS] absolute(int rownumber) method not implemented as per Sun guidlines

2001-03-12 Thread Peter Mount
At 13:22 08/03/01 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Rahul Tyagi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) reports a bug with a severity of 2 >The lower the number the more severe it is. > >Short Description >absolute(int rownumber) method not implemented as per Sun guidlines > >Long Description >absolute(int rownumber)

Re: [BUGS] createStatement(int,int) of interface Statement not implemented

2001-03-12 Thread Peter Mount
At 13:24 08/03/01 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Rahul Tyagi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) reports a bug with a severity of 2 >The lower the number the more severe it is. > >Short Description >createStatement(int,int) of interface Statement not implemented > >Long Description >createStatement(int,int) of

Re: [BUGS] Bug #694: can't store {digits} using JDBC

2002-06-21 Thread Peter Mount
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Dan Brown ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) reports a bug with a severity of 2 > The lower the number the more severe it is. > > Short Description > can't store {digits} using JDBC > > Long Description We are using the JDBC driver, and are losing partial > data.

[BUGS] bug in vacuumlo (postgreSQL-7.3)? (fwd)

2002-12-02 Thread Peter Mount
-- Forwarded message -- Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 23:32:35 -0500 From: Hsin-Yu Sidney Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Peter Mount <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: bug in vacuumlo (postgreSQL-7.3)? Hi, I'm sorry if this has already been reported. (I had no luck searchi

Re: [BUGS] Movie

2003-06-26 Thread Peter Mount
Yes, it's Sobig.E. It seems that someone out there is infected with it and I've had about 20 reports of this coming from me (which is funny as I don't use M$ for email ;-) ). That's the problem with the recent virii as they a forging the addresses :-( Peter -- Peter Mo