untVariable;
-- Korry
-------
Korry Douglas
Senior Database Dude
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Enterprise Postgres Company
Phone: (804)241-4301
Mobile: (620) EDB-NERD
On closer look, it's quite obvious: the code added to
ECPGdump_a_type thinks that ECPGt_const is a variable type, and
tries to look up the variable. The straightforward fix is this:
...
But I wonder if there is a better way to identify variable-kind of
ECPGttypes than list the ones that are not. T
On closer look, it's quite obvious: the code added to
ECPGdump_a_type thinks that ECPGt_const is a variable type, and
tries to look up the variable. The straightforward fix is this:
...
But I wonder if there is a better way to identify variable-kind of
ECPGttypes than list the ones that are not. T
e that a third-party JDBC driver was doing some
behind-the-curtains work on your behalf.
-- Korry
-----------
Korry Douglas
Senior Database Dude
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Enterprise Postgres Company
Phone: (804)241-43
> We may have different perceptions of something being a 'bug'. I always
> have several simple ways of determining it. One of them is when a
> work-around is in the proposal. Yours is one.
It seems to me that the important question in this case is whether or not the
query produced the correct res
Frank, thanks for educating me.
-- Korry
> -Original Message-
> From: Korry Douglas [mailto:korry.doug...@enterprisedb.com]
> Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2011 2:34 PM
> To: frank
> Cc: 'Kevin Grittner'; pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [BUGS]
;no data" is coming from some code that is not
>> written to cope with that happening.
>>
>> You might consider using a cursor to fetch large results a few rows at a
>> time.
>>
>> regards, tom lane
>>
>
> --
> Sent via
What would you expect the new log file to be named? Your log_filename is set
to postgresql-%a.log. The %a part expands to the current day of the week. If
it's Thursday and you already have a file for Thursday, what would the new file
name be?
-- Korry
> The following bug has
quence that meant "replace me with the next available sequence number... %n
might translate to _1, _2, _3, ...).
-- Korry
P.S. I'm not disagreeing with you, just explaining the code as it exists today.
>
> Brad.
>
>> -Original Message-
&g
