Sorry,
I somehow missed including the exact error message I get when inserting
:
Bad (null) varchar() external representation
Regards and best wishes,
Justin Clift
Database Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Justin Clift ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) reports a bug with a severity of 2
Sorry, forgot to put the -request on the end of the username in the
email address.
+ Justin Clift
Hi all,
There's a spelling mistake on the users-lounge part of the PostgreSQL
website...
"pgsql-bugs If you find bug, fill "
should be :
"pgsql-bugs If you find a bug, fill "
Yes, it's small. But's it's kind of funny when you think about it. :-)
+ Justin
---(en
array
isbn_issn lo mSQL-interface mac miscutil noupdate oid2name pg_dumplo
pg_logger pgbench pgcrypto rserv seg soundex spi string tips unixdate
userlock vacuumlo; do \
if [ -e $dir/Makefile ]; then \
make -C $dir clean; \
fi; \
done
/bin/sh: test: argument expected
make[1]:
ange the amount of shared memory segments and
semaphores.
Whenever I have those problems, I insert the updated (higher) values for
shared memory and semaphores, reboot the system, then the tests pass as
the backend is able to start fine.
Hope this is helpful.
Regards and best wishes,
Justin Clift
them know that something may be wrong?
They're up to beta2 of their next release so now's probably the time to
work things out.
Regards and best wishes,
Justin Clift
Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Justin Clift writes:
>
ng this now to
their developer list) and also work around the problem ourselves?
Regards and best wishes,
+ Justin Clift
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> Justin Clift writes:
>
> > When --with-openssl= is given to configure
> > on Solaris 8 INTEL, the compilation errors in :
>
Can you tell me more about this strange behaviour? If it's appropriate,
I'll try to get it onto the techdocs website.
Regards and best wishes,
Justin Clift
Tom Lane wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > We noticed a strange behavior involving 'except' an
That sounds like The Right Way of doing it; most responsible,
technically sound, etc.
Regards and best wishes,
Justin Clift
Larry Rosenman wrote:
> I suspect renaming it would be the best way, since we have 2 major
> (SUN, SCO) vendors claiming a des_encrypt() function in their li
Hi Jay,
Which OS are you using? Mandrake-Linux 7.2 is known to have bugs in the
version of PostgreSQL they supply as RPM's.
Regards and best wishes,
Justin Clift
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Jay Guerette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) reports a bug with a severity of 2
> The lower the n
is was fixed in 7.1.
i.e. '192.168.1.1'
Depending on how you're doing things, you *might* be able to wrap stuff
in a btrim() function for 7.0.x.
i.e. btrim() should return '192.168.1.1'
Well, you get the idea. Might be a start of a workaround for you
anyway.
Regard
e.
Regards and best wishes,
Justin Clift
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> JP ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) reports a bug with a severity of 2
> The lower the number the more severe it is.
>
> Short Description
> debug_level 0 does not stop debug messages
>
> Long Description
>
ger to the postmaster process as
you've suggested and see what it thinks is going on.
:-)
Regards and best wishes,
Justin Clift
Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Justin Clift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Just did a :
> > pg_ctl stop -m fast
> > And the postmaster process won&
her than 32, then
restart PostgreSQL. This value can also be altered at compile time to
whatever you want (32 is the default here and thats what gets passed to
the postgresql.conf file).
Hope this helps.
Regards and best wishes,
Justin Clift
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Sergio Muscat ([EMAIL
the numbers should be sequential. Just checked the
archives and didn't find anything regarding this.
Bug or not?
Regards and best wishes,
Justin Clift
--
"My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
who work and those who take the credit. He told me to tr
Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Justin Clift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I would have though that after 00FE would be
> > 0100, not 0001.
>
> > Just checked through the Interactive docs (not sure which version of 7.1
> > t
rner site" which Vince created. Looks
pretty nice, new color scheme, better layout, etc. People get to it
when clicking on "Developer's Corner" from the main PostgreSQL site.
:)
Regards and best wishes,
Justin Clift
>
> reg
e.
Regards and best wishes,
Justin Clift
>
> > Justin Clift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > I would have though that after 00FE would be
> > > 0100, not 0001.
> >
> > This is the intended behavior, I believe. The
installed already about 4 prior versions of PostgreSQL, every time working this
>same way and never had this problem, every time working on some Mandrake distribution.
I strongly feel you already had/have some kind of PostgreSQL
installation on your system, and I would point the finger
and best wishes,
Justin Clift
--
"My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
first group; there was less competition there."
- Indira Gandhi
---
server has kept the number of packages on this server
to a minimum, so it's possible some needed program is missing.
Does anyone have any ideas? Please bear in mind that everything
compiles fine without the -DUSE_AUSTRALIAN_FLAGS option.
Haven't tried current CVS, but it's an intere
Hi Bruce,
There is ZERO possibility of using 7.2betaX on this server. It's a
critical production machine and requirements are such that it's been
migrated to RedHat 7.1.
Is there no way to get this working?
Regards and best wishes,
Justin Clift
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Ple
Hi Paul,
You might like to try the very good installation guide for PostgreSQL on
Windows at :
http://www.ejip.net/faq/postgresql_win_setup_faq.jsp
Added a link to it from the techdocs.postgresql.org website earlier
today too.
:-)
Regards and best wishes,
Justin Clift
On Thursday 21
Peter wrote:
>
> Justin Clift suggested:
> http://www.ejip.net/faq/postgresql_win_setup_faq.jsp
> I started from scratch following the page and adapting it where it is
> out of date. I reached the stage of starting postmaster and receiving
> the message:
> DEBUG: pq_recvb
Hi Prison,
I've created Web Sphere packages for Solaria 8, and had to install Web
Sphere numerous times in the process of getting it right (learning curve
thing).
For getting Web Sphere to work with PostgreSQL... it doesn't work right
out of the box. When you install Web Sphere 4.0x (not sure a
entire PostgreSQL $PGDATA directory (*with
PostgreSQL not running!*).
That way, if anything does go wrong, you can always copy this backup
into place and um.. try again (but differently of course).
:-)
Regards and best wishes,
Justin Clift
> If this is the way to go, please
> confirm th
Hi Yuxia,
Which version of PostgreSQL is this with, and did you compile PostgreSQL
yourself?
Regards and best wishes,
Justin Clift
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yuxia ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) reports a bug with a severity of 2
The lower the number the more severe it is.
Short Description
Install
Tom Lane wrote:
I believe there are known problems with BSD kernels sometimes returning
wrong clock readings on SMP machines, so that might be a place to look too.
Thanks Tom.
Just filled out a FreeBSD Bug Report, so we'll see how that goes.
:)
Regards and best wishes,
Justin Clift
re
pool" of it as made
available on the host system, but have been under the impression
PostgreSQL is coded to not corrupt in this kind of situation.
Regards and best wishes,
Justin Clift
Original Message
Subject: Re: misc/72498: Libc timestamp code on jailed SMP machine
g
Hi all,
Does anyone have further input on this?
Regards and best wishes,
Justin Clift
Justin Clift wrote:
Subject:
[Fwd: Re: misc/72498: Libc timestamp code on jailed SMP machine
generates incorrect results]
From:
Justin
few
seconds to load than I was expecting (about 10 seconds in total), but
didn't time out.
If we get more reports of this, indicating its a continuing problem,
then we'll look into it. Otherwise, hopefully the failure was just a
once-off.
Thanks for letting us know guys.
Regard
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 1377
Logged by: Justin Clift
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: 8.0
Operating system: Various
Description:Testing the bug submission form
Details:
Tom forwarded an email saying the bug
32 matches
Mail list logo
