Re: [BUGS] BUG #4599: bugfix for contrib/dblink module

2009-01-02 Thread Joe Conway
Oleksiy Shchukin wrote: The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 4599 Logged by: Oleksiy Shchukin Email address: oleksiy.shchu...@globallogic.com PostgreSQL version: 8.3.5 Operating system: all Description:bugfix for contrib/dblink module [snip] d

Re: [BUGS] BUG #4876: author of MD5 says it's seriously broken - hash collision resistance problems

2009-06-24 Thread Joe Conway
Meredith L. Patterson wrote: Magnus Hagander wrote: this has implications for storing passwords as MD5 hashes. My That would be the only system use of MD5. What implications are those? We might want to consider using a safer hash for the password storage at some point, but from what I ga

Re: [BUGS] BUG #4916: wish: more statistical functions (median, percentiles etc)

2009-07-12 Thread Joe Conway
Joshua Tolley wrote: On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 02:12:22AM +0100, Richard Neill wrote: Thanks for your reply. Sadly, I haven't the time (or expertise) to write this myself. However, the feature would be really useful to have. I'd certainly be willing to make a £200 payment or donation in return.

Re: [BUGS] dblink generates orphaned connections

2009-09-12 Thread Joe Conway
Tatsuhito Kasahara wrote: > dblink generates orphaned connections when we failed on performing dblink() > function. > # But it occurs only when dblink('conn_str', 'sql', true). See following > examples. > I think that the dblink should not ereport() before PQfinish(conn) in > dblink_record_inter

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5304: psql using conninfo fails in connecting to the server

2010-02-01 Thread Joe Conway
On 02/01/2010 08:06 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Heikki Linnakangas writes: >> Fujii Masao wrote: >>> In HEAD, psql using conninfo fails in connecting to the server as follows. >>> >>> $ bin/psql "host=localhost" >>> psql: FATAL: database "host=localhost" does not exist >>> >>> This is because the recen

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5304: psql using conninfo fails in connecting to the server

2010-02-02 Thread Joe Conway
On 02/01/2010 08:06 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Heikki Linnakangas writes: >> Fujii Masao wrote: >>> In HEAD, psql using conninfo fails in connecting to the server as follows. >>> >>> $ bin/psql "host=localhost" >>> psql: FATAL: database "host=localhost" does not exist >>> >>> This is because the recen

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5304: psql using conninfo fails in connecting to the server

2010-02-02 Thread Joe Conway
On 02/02/2010 05:46 PM, Fujii Masao wrote: > On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Joe Conway wrote: >> Objections? > > I think that PQconnectdbParams() rather than psql should handle the > dbname containing "=". Otherwise whenever we use PQconnectdbParams(), > we woul

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5304: psql using conninfo fails in connecting to the server

2010-02-02 Thread Joe Conway
On 02/02/2010 05:59 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > This seems bogus on a couple of levels. First off, I thought the idea > was to get away from using PQsetdbLogin at all. If we go down this path > we'll never be rid of it. Second, to preserve backwards compatibility > we will have to duplicate this same

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5304: psql using conninfo fails in connecting to the server

2010-02-02 Thread Joe Conway
On 02/02/2010 06:10 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Since we haven't yet released PQconnectdbParams, it's not too late > to twiddle its API. What I'm thinking about is an additional > boolean parameter "expand_dbname", which only if true would enable > treating an equal-sign-containing dbname like a conninf

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5304: psql using conninfo fails in connecting to the server

2010-02-02 Thread Joe Conway
On 02/02/2010 06:40 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > The difference with PQconnectdbParams is that the dbname might not be > the first thing in the parameter array. I think that a straightforward > implementation would have the effect of the expanded dbname overriding > parameters given before it, but not th

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5304: psql using conninfo fails in connecting to the server

2010-02-02 Thread Joe Conway
On 02/02/2010 10:08 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Joe Conway writes: >> Are there any of the psql parameters that we do not want to allow to be >> overridden by the conninfo string? > > Actually, now that I think about it, psql shouldn't be setting > application_name

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5304: psql using conninfo fails in connecting to the server

2010-02-03 Thread Joe Conway
On 02/02/2010 10:23 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Joe Conway writes: >> Should I also be looking to replace all (or most) other instances of >> PQsetdbLogin()? > > I think we at least wanted to fix pg_dump(all)/pg_restore. Not sure if > the others are worth troubling over

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5304: psql using conninfo fails in connecting to the server

2010-02-04 Thread Joe Conway
On 02/04/2010 01:23 AM, Fujii Masao wrote: > On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Joe Conway wrote: >> OK, this one includes pg_dump(all)/pg_restore and common.c from >> bin/scripts (createdb, vacuumdb, etc). I still need to adjust the docs, >> but other than that any

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5304: psql using conninfo fails in connecting to the server

2010-02-04 Thread Joe Conway
On 02/04/2010 08:31 AM, Joe Conway wrote: > On 02/04/2010 01:23 AM, Fujii Masao wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Joe Conway wrote: >>> OK, this one includes pg_dump(all)/pg_restore and common.c from >>> bin/scripts (createdb, vacuumdb, etc). I still need to adj

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5304: psql using conninfo fails in connecting to the server

2010-02-04 Thread Joe Conway
On 02/04/2010 09:37 AM, Joe Conway wrote: > On 02/04/2010 08:31 AM, Joe Conway wrote: >> On 02/04/2010 01:23 AM, Fujii Masao wrote: >>> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Joe Conway wrote: >>>> OK, this one includes pg_dump(all)/pg_restore and common.c from >>>

Re: [BUGS] PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required?

2010-02-24 Thread Joe Conway
On 02/24/2010 08:43 AM, Lou Picciano wrote: > Tom - > > Didn't realize I was arm waving - was I? (Sometimes email falls well > short...) > > We've managed a build of PostgreSQL 9.0-alpha4 - nice! However, the # > make install command apparently(?) hiccups > on a dependency on Jade (we ain't u

Re: [BUGS] Bug #467: Can't insert a value of 0 (zero) into a Bytea

2001-09-24 Thread Joe Conway
> > Short Description > > Can't insert a value of 0 (zero) into a Bytea type. > > > > Long Description > > It does not zeem possible to insert a value of zero (0) into a bytea type. A > > lso, using '\134' (the octal code for a backslash) causes byteain() to genera > > te an error message. > > >

Re: [BUGS] Bug #625: bytea data type problem/bug

2002-03-27 Thread Joe Conway
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Eric Lu ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) reports a bug with a severity of 4 > The lower the number the more severe it is. > > Short Description > bytea data type problem/bug > > Long Description > Hi, > > It happens when I was trying to test the avalaibility of the new binary data

Re: [BUGS] BUG #2600: dblink compile with SSL missing libraries

2006-08-30 Thread Joe Conway
Christopher Browne wrote: The following bug has been logged online: If I try to build dblink when PG is configured "--with-openssl", the build of the contrib module dblink breaks as follows: If I add, to the GCC command line, requests for libssl and libcrypto... -lssl -lcrypto e.g. - comm

Re: [BUGS] BUG #2694: Memory allocation error when selecting array

2006-10-18 Thread Joe Conway
Tom Lane wrote: "Vitali Stupin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: The error "invalid memory alloc request size 4294967293" apears when selecting array of empty arrays: select ARRAY['{}'::text[],'{}'::text[]]; I can get a core dump off it too, sometimes. The problem is in ExecEvalArray, which compu

Re: [BUGS] BUG #2694: Memory allocation error when selecting array

2006-10-29 Thread Joe Conway
Tom Lane wrote: Joe Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Sorry for the slow response -- I'm at the airport just heading home from a marathon 30 day business trip. Yow. Hope you get some time off... Yeah, I just took a week. Next week I'm back to work and the week after

Re: [BUGS] BUG #3852: Could not create complex aggregate

2008-01-07 Thread Joe Conway
Tom Lane wrote: "Sokolov Yura" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: create or replace function add_group(grp anyarray, ad anyelement, size int4) returns anyarray language plpgsql ... create aggregate build_group(anyelement, int4) ( SFUNC= add_group, STYPE = anyarray ); ERROR: argument declared

Re: [BUGS] BUG #3983: pgxs files still missing in win32 install (8.3.1)

2008-04-06 Thread Joe Conway
Dave Page wrote: On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 12:47 AM, Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Mike Leahy wrote: > Is this actually a bug, or is there a specific reason that the pgxs > files omitted in the windows installer? I noticed the 8.3.1 installer > has been posted (as the updates had a

Re: [BUGS] BUG #3983: pgxs files still missing in win32 install (8.3.1)

2008-04-13 Thread Joe Conway
Magnus Hagander wrote: In general, mingw built modules should load just fine in msvc built postgres. AFAIK, that's how PostGIS does it for 8.3 (though I know Mark is working on getting MSVC build support for them). Debugging may be a bit harder (since they use different kinds of debug symbols - p

Re: [BUGS] BUG #3983: pgxs files still missing in win32 install (8.3.1)

2008-04-14 Thread Joe Conway
Magnus Hagander wrote: Could this be somethingl ike missing PGDLLIMPORT specifications in your addon module or something like that? Try checking the names of the functions that are actually exported using "depends" or a similar tool. Ah, that sounds likely, since I have never had to worry abou

Re: [BUGS] BUG #4203: perform dblink() in begin/exception returns wrong SQLSTATE code

2008-05-27 Thread Joe Conway
Tom Lane wrote: "Henry Combrinck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Description:perform dblink() in begin/exception returns wrong SQLSTATE code The code returned is always 42601 (syntax_error) irrespective of the actual error (eg, unique_violation). Yeah, the dblink code should probably t

Re: [BUGS] pg_dumpall forces plain text format

2002-07-11 Thread Joe Conway
grant wrote: > You could fake some of this (select only) by using the dblink stuff in > contrib. You could link back to yourself and make it work. Maybe if > you REALLY need it, you could modify dblink to allow updates as well as > selects. If you really need it that bad, you have the sourc

Re: [BUGS] Bug #712: Documentation Section 3.4 Binary Strings

2002-07-16 Thread Joe Conway
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > David Clark ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) reports a bug with a severity > Table 3-7 SQL Literal escaped octets shows the input escape > representation for a single quote as '\\'' , but the third paragraph > below table 3-8 SQL Output Escaped Octets says that the single quote

Re: [BUGS] Bug #728: Interactions between bytea and character encoding

2002-08-03 Thread Joe Conway
Anders Hammarquist wrote: >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >> >>>If a byte string that is not valid unicode is inserted into a bytea >>>column, analyze will fail unless the data was tagged as bytea in the >>>insert. >> >>Your example produces no failure for me. You'd better be more specific >>about wh

Re: [BUGS] Bug #728: Interactions between bytea and character encoding

2002-08-03 Thread Joe Conway
Tom Lane wrote: > Ah. So the issue is that ANALYZE tries to do textin(byteaout(...)) > in order to produce a textual representation of the most common value > in the BYTEA column, and apparently textin feels that the string > generated by byteaout is not legal text. While Joe says that the > pro

Re: [BUGS] Bug #728: Interactions between bytea and character encoding

2002-08-03 Thread Joe Conway
Bruce Momjian wrote: > Does this mean we don't have to esacpe >0x7f when inputting bytea > anymore? I seem to remember that bytea data was run through the multibute code for some reason, and I don't recall seeing that changed. ISTM that we shouldn't force bytea thought multibyte functions at al

Re: [BUGS] Bug #728: Interactions between bytea and character encoding

2002-08-04 Thread Joe Conway
Joe Conway wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > >> Does this mean we don't have to esacpe >0x7f when inputting bytea >> anymore? > > > I seem to remember that bytea data was run through the multibute code > for some reason, and I don't recall seeing th

Re: [BUGS] Bug #736: Old bug is back!! Drop database bug

2002-08-12 Thread Joe Conway
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Chester Chee ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) reports a bug with a severity > of 2 The lower the number the more severe it is. > > Short Description Old bug is back!! Drop database bug > > Long Description PostgreSQL version 7.2.1 running on RedHat 7.3 with > all the latest pa

Re: [BUGS] Bug #728: Interactions between bytea and character encoding

2002-08-13 Thread Joe Conway
Bruce Momjian wrote: > I am hoping for a patch for this for 7.3. Added to open items: > > Fix bytea to not encode input string > I said: > Here's the remaining issue that I remembered; see: > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2002-04/msg00256.php > > The gist of this is that w

Re: [BUGS] Schemas not available for pl/pgsql %TYPE....

2002-09-05 Thread Joe Conway
Sean Chittenden wrote: > Not a problem there. I walked around the code for a bit, made a few > hacks to see how things are working, and I can tell you strait up that > if you'd like this by 7.3, it won't be happening from me. <:~) I'm > stretched kinda thin as is and don't think I'll be able to

Re: [BUGS] some other backend died abnormally

2002-09-22 Thread Joe Conway
fredrik chabot wrote: > connection to server was lost > > I get more or less frequently. > > what to do? Start by giving us more information. What version of Postgres? What platform (Linux, etc)? What does the relevant portion of your database schema look like? What repeatable series of action

Re: [BUGS] Creating server-side functions: one simple error

2002-10-09 Thread Joe Conway
Ruslan A Dautkhanov wrote: > Btw, how I can convert TEXT field to a CString one? I had tried to use > char *cnum = PG_GETARG_CSTRING(0) instead of > text tnum = PG_GETARG_NAME(0), but it's not worked properly. Is any function > to convert text object to a null-terminated string??? Thanks ag

Re: [BUGS] user name lost from dictionary

2002-10-10 Thread Joe Conway
Elielson Fontanezi wrote: > GRANT ALL on "recursos_materiais" to "user_fomacao_des"; --< Here is the > point in question [...snip...] > REVOKE ALL on "recursos_materiais" from PUBLIC; > GRANT ALL on "recursos_materiais" to "131"; --< What is it? > > Is that a bug? It looks like someone dropped u

Re: [BUGS] Creating server-side functions: one simple error

2002-10-13 Thread Joe Conway
elein (by way of elein ) wrote: > This will not work if there is no EOS on the data portion of the > string. Text fields are not usually stored with the EOS on them, > are they? Yes, the TEXT data type is NULL terminated. Joe ---(end of broadcast)

bogus varno EXPLAIN bug (was Re: [BUGS] Explain analyze gives bogusvarno for dblink views)

2002-12-05 Thread Joe Conway
Kris Jurka wrote: This behavior is present in 7.3 as well. On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Kris Jurka wrote: Using the old < 7.3 version of dblink on 7.4devel gives a "get_names_for_var: bogus varno 5" error. I can confirm this both on cvs tip (pulled after noon PST today) and 7.3 stable branch. It is no

Re: bogus varno EXPLAIN bug (was Re: [BUGS] Explain analyze gives

2002-12-06 Thread Joe Conway
Tom Lane wrote: Ah, thanks for the simplified test case. This is undoubtedly my fault ... will look into it. It is probably somewhat related to the join alias problem found yesterday (ie, somebody somewhere is trying to use the wrong rangetable list to interpret a Var node). I spent a bit more

Re: [BUGS] ON DELETE triggers don't work as documented

2002-12-11 Thread Joe Conway
Mike Glover wrote: Please enter a FULL description of your problem: The docs state (section 23.9): If a non-NULL value is returned then the operation proceeds with that row value. Note that returning a row value different from the original value o

Re: [BUGS] "ERROR: Query-specified return tuple and actual function

2003-01-13 Thread Joe Conway
Andrzej Kosmala wrote: PostgreSQL 7.3 on Linux After dropping column functions return error message: "ERROR: Query-specified return tuple and actual function return tuple do not match" Hmmm, looks like nodeFunctionscan.c:tupledesc_mismatch needs to be taught about attisdropped. I'll submit a pa

Re: [BUGS] "ERROR: Query-specified return tuple and actual function

2003-01-13 Thread Joe Conway
Tom Lane wrote: > Joe Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Hmmm, looks like nodeFunctionscan.c:tupledesc_mismatch needs to be >> taught about attisdropped. I'll submit a patch this evening if no >> one else gets to it first. > > Actually, I believe I delibe

Re: [BUGS] Bug #915: problem with returning setof with double precision

2003-03-21 Thread Joe Conway
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Daniel Brozek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) reports a bug with a severity of 2 The lower the number the more severe it is. Short Description problem with returning setof with double precision values Long Description I have got the table and the function (look at example code). Afte

Re: [BUGS] bug in the concatenation of the selection...

2003-06-08 Thread Joe Conway
Andres Cuevas wrote: If data1 or data2 are NULL the request is NULL Which is the correct behavior, not a bug. See: http://techdocs.postgresql.org/guides/BriefGuideToNulls HTH, Joe ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ

Re: [BUGS] error in docs

2003-08-16 Thread Joe Conway
andrea gelmini wrote: test=# SELECT * FROM sal_emp WHERE pay_by_quarter[1:4] *= 1; ERROR: Unable to identify an operator '*=' for types 'integer[]' and 'integer' You will have to retype this query using an explicit cast There's nothing wrong with the docs (well, at least not with respe

Re: [BUGS] Database Grants Bug

2003-08-17 Thread Joe Conway
Marcus England wrote: Grants do not work at the database level using the syntax mentioned in the documentation. i.e.: GRANT ALL ON DATABASE dbname TO GROUP groupname; Or GRANT ALL ON DATABASE dbname TO username; Works here: regression=# select version(); version ---

Re: [BUGS] Database Grants Bug

2003-08-18 Thread Joe Conway
Marcus England wrote: IMHO, this is confusing and limiting for Administrators who wish to grant privileges beyond CREATE, TEMPORARY, and TEMP across all tables in a database. Something I believe most, if not all other DBMS's do. "ALL" isn't very consistent. Again, I don't know what your definition

Re: [BUGS] PG 7.4 BETA 3: Bug in NULL arrays updating

2003-09-23 Thread Joe Conway
Tom Lane wrote: Bertrand Petit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: When updating a NULL cell which is an array of something, setting an adressed member of a non existent array, the value of the cell is not changed. Assigning to a member of a NULL array has always yielded another NULL array. While

Re: [BUGS] Bug Report

2003-10-08 Thread Joe Conway
Branden R. Williams wrote: POSTGRESQL BUG REPORT TEMPLATE Your name : Branden R. Williams Your email addres

Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Autocomplete on Postgres7.4beta5 not working?

2003-10-28 Thread Joe Conway
Alvaro Herrera Munoz wrote: On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 04:48:59PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: AFAICT there was no discussion about this issue when the patch was proposed and applied. But now that the point is raised I have to say that I don't like this change. I don't think system catalogs should be excl

Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] postgresql-7.4RC1 - unrecognized privilege type

2003-11-08 Thread Joe Conway
Tom Lane wrote: Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I think we should fix it but not force an initdb --- information_schema is new and I am not sure how many people are using it. Yeah, I'm leaning that way too. We could publicize a script to fix the problem in any beta5 or RC1 databases tha

Re: [BUGS] failed to lookup type 0

2003-11-29 Thread Joe Conway
Vernon Smith wrote: When I try to delete data from one table, I get this error: ERROR: get_typdefault: failed to lookup type 0 I can't find any reasons other than a bug. The PG version is 7.3.4 And neither can we without some details. Please post the results of \d tablename , the definitions o

Re: [BUGS] bytea, index and like operator

2003-12-03 Thread Joe Conway
Alvar Freude wrote: PostgreSQL 7.3.4 on i386-portbld-freebsd4.8, compiled by GCC 2.95.4 begin; create table test (b bytea); create index tst_idx on test(b); insert into test values ('\001abc\006'); insert into test values ('\001xabc\006'); insert into test values ('\001\002abc\006')

Re: [BUGS] BUG #1000: Testing new bugs form.

2003-12-04 Thread Joe Conway
PostgreSQL Bugs List wrote: The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 1000 Logged by: Dave Page Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PostgreSQL version: 7.5 Dev Operating system: FreeBSD www.postgresql.com 4.8-STABLE FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE #5: Sat Sep 20 14:56:14 ADT 2

Re: [BUGS] Backslash Bug in ARE Class-Shorthand Escape?

2003-12-06 Thread Joe Conway
David Fetter wrote: I have a little puzzlement. In the first select, I double the backslash and return true. In the second, I don't and get false. Have I missed something important in the docs? I don't know if it is clear in the docs anywhere wrt regex, but the string literal parser will consume

Re: [BUGS] Backslash Bug in ARE Class-Shorthand Escape?

2003-12-06 Thread Joe Conway
Joe Conway wrote: David Fetter wrote: I have a little puzzlement. In the first select, I double the backslash and return true. In the second, I don't and get false. Have I missed something important in the docs? I don't know if it is clear in the docs anywhere wrt regex, but the stri

Re: [BUGS] Error compiling PostgreSQL 7.4 for Fedora Core 1

2003-12-09 Thread Joe Conway
Tom Lane wrote: We could fall back in that direction if we had to. But I'd like to understand why we have to, first. Gen_fmgrtab.sh has worked on all our supported platforms for a long time, and I'm disinclined to assume that it's suddenly broken ... especially on what's presumably a modern platf

Re: [BUGS] BUG #1007: error during installation

2003-12-14 Thread Joe Conway
PostgreSQL Bugs List wrote: This application has failed to start because mspdb71.dll was not found. Re-installing the application may fix this problem. This has nothing to do with Postgres. "mspdb71.dll" is part of Visual Studio .Net -- look in: "c:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio .NET 2003\

Re: [BUGS] NULL in arrays

2004-01-15 Thread Joe Conway
cases like this. But I don't see an inherent reason why "raise an error" is better than "return a null array". In fact, the above referenced thread shows a scenario where the former behavior is unpleasant. I think Joe Conway is planning to tackle that underlying misfeatur

Re: [BUGS] NULL in arrays

2004-01-15 Thread Joe Conway
Dennis Bjorklund wrote: On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Joe Conway wrote: Additionally, this behavior was discussed during the 7.4 development and beta cycles on at least a couple occassions -- that would have been the time to complain, not now. Well, I will complain whenever I see something I don't

Re: [BUGS] Glitch: cannot use Arrays with Raise Notice

2004-03-11 Thread Joe Conway
Josh Berkus wrote: Bug: Cannot Use Arrays with Raise Notice in PL/pgSQL. Version Tested: 7.4.1 Severity: Annoyance Description: Attempting to pass an array element to Raise Notice in PL/pgSQL will produce a parse error: I can reproduce this with cvs tip -- I'll check into it. Thanks, Joe --

Re: [BUGS] casting strings to multidimensional arrays yields strange

2004-07-27 Thread Joe Conway
Tom Lane wrote: Right now I think the sanest behavior would be to throw an error on non-rectangular input. Once we have support for null elements in arrays, however, it would arguably be reasonable to pad with NULLs where needed, so that the above would be read as {{1,2},{2,3},{4,NULL}}

Re: [BUGS] BUG #1313: problems with array syntax parsing in SQL

2004-11-12 Thread Joe Conway
PostgreSQL Bugs List wrote: In INSERT statements the string '{}' is correctly parsed as an empty array when '{ }' is not, as if the space was signifiant, and generates a syntax error. Also '{"A", "B"}' will be correctly parsed when '{"A", "B" }' (note the space before the closing brace ) will

Re: [BUGS] BUG #1532: typecast problem between arrays of an int8

2005-03-24 Thread Joe Conway
Tom Lane wrote: "Ezequiel Tolnay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I've created the cardnumber_t datatype, which is an int8, to provide implicit typecasting with varchar padding the result with zeroes. Conversions work as expected between int4, int8, cardnumber_t and varchar. They also work fine between

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5583: dblink connection error

2010-07-30 Thread Joe Conway
hint: auth-method Also read: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/interactive/contrib-dblink-connect.html -and- http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/interactive/contrib-dblink-connect-u.html HTH, Joe -- Joe Conway credativ LLC: http://www.credativ.us Linux, PostgreSQL, and general Open Source Train

Re: [BUGS] PL/R Median Busts Commit (Postgres 9.1.6 + plr 8.3.0.13 on Ubuntu 12.10 64 bit)

2013-01-24 Thread Joe Conway
9 ( id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, val TEXT); > INSERT INTO tab99 SELECT generate_series(1,1000),'xx'; > SELECT median(id) FROM tab99; > COMMIT; > > > We crash at commit. > > Changing median to something else (e.g avg or even a non PLR median > functi

Re: [BUGS] PL/R Median Busts Commit (Postgres 9.1.6 + plr 8.3.0.13 on Ubuntu 12.10 64 bit)

2013-01-24 Thread Joe Conway
On 01/24/2013 08:01 PM, Mark Kirkwood wrote: > Ah right - sorry, I did a quick look for a mail list on the plr web site > and didn't spot anything. No problem. It is plr-general on pgfoundry: http://pgfoundry.org/mail/?group_id=1000247 Joe -- Joe Conway credativ LLC: http://www.

Re: [BUGS] PL/R Median Busts Commit (Postgres 9.1.6 + plr 8.3.0.13 on Ubuntu 12.10 64 bit)

2013-01-24 Thread Joe Conway
finish and investigating what's causing the first error > call. Yeah -- will do. Thanks! Joe -- Joe Conway credativ LLC: http://www.credativ.us Linux, PostgreSQL, and general Open Source Training, Service, Consulting, & 24x7 Support -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pg

Re: [BUGS] PL/R Median Busts Commit (Postgres 9.1.6 + plr 8.3.0.13 on Ubuntu 12.10 64 bit)

2013-01-28 Thread Joe Conway
> Making use of this seems to fix the original bug - and possibly the > SIGINT stealing too. > > Patch attached to set the variable (R_SignalHandlers = 0), and remove > the SIGINT workaround. Cool -- thanks. Maybe that got added in a release since last I looked. Joe -- Joe

Re: [BUGS] tablefunc extension

2013-09-22 Thread Joe Conway
the documentation: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/interactive/tablefunc.html If you still have a problem please provide SQL that can be cut and pasted which: 1) create your table 2) insert sample rows Then show us what out put you are trying to acheive as output from that data. Joe - --

Re: [BUGS] tablefunc extension

2013-09-22 Thread Joe Conway
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/22/2013 04:17 PM, Joe Conway wrote: > If you still have a problem please provide SQL that can be cut and > pasted which: 1) create your table 2) insert sample rows Then show > us what out put you are trying to acheive as output from th