[BUGS] BUG #4374: pg_restore does not restore public schema comment

2008-08-25 Thread Daniel Migowski
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 4374 Logged by: Daniel Migowski Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PostgreSQL version: 8.3.3 Operating system: Windows Description:pg_restore does not restore public schema comment Details: Hello dear

[BUGS] BUG #4375: pg_dump documentation, -Z option

2008-08-25 Thread Daniel Migowski
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 4375 Logged by: Daniel Migowski Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PostgreSQL version: 8.3.1 Operating system: Linux Description:pg_dump documentation, -Z option Details: The option documentation misses the

Re: [BUGS] BUG #4374: pg_restore does not restore public schema comment

2008-08-26 Thread Daniel Migowski
quot;DROP SCHEMA public" in the file. Thats why I assumed pg_restore fails here. I haven't checked to see if a custom dump behaves differently. Craig Ringer I didn't check the plain text format :). Daniel Migowski -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-

[BUGS] Set-returning functions only allowed if written in language 'sql'

2009-02-10 Thread Daniel Migowski
' and works, y() is written is plpgsql and fails. Any reasons for this I do not realize? With best regards, Daniel Migowski CREATE FUNCTION x() RETURNS SETOF int4 AS $$ SELECT 1 UNION SELECT 2 $$ LANGUAGE 'sql'; SELECT x(); -- fine with two

[BUGS] BUG #4971: Backend crash while doing nothing...

2009-08-09 Thread Daniel Migowski
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 4971 Logged by: Daniel Migowski Email address: dmigow...@ikoffice.de PostgreSQL version: 8.3.5 Operating system: Windows XP Description:Backend crash while doing nothing... Details: Hello, poor dear debuggers

[BUGS] Wishlist: Please ad a switch to dectivate the comments in the dump

2006-09-07 Thread Daniel Migowski
This would greatly reduce the effords for me do use a diff on two dumps to check for new stuff to insert. There has been a similar discussion some years ago, so i guess that I am not the only one who would benefit from this. Thanks in advance, Daniel Migowski -- |¯¯|¯¯|Ingenieurbüro

[BUGS] BUG #3808: Connections stays open in state CLOSE_WAIT

2007-12-07 Thread Daniel Migowski
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 3808 Logged by: Daniel Migowski Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PostgreSQL version: 8.1.4 Operating system: Windows Server 2003 Description:Connections stays open in state CLOSE_WAIT Details: Hello dear bug

Re: [BUGS] BUG #3808: Connections stays open in stateCLOSE_WAIT

2008-01-07 Thread Daniel Migowski
ed production site. Btw. the update went without a glitch and was done in 5 Minutes, good work for that. But I didn't know that and asking before having to restore something for hours because of a failed update seems legitimate to me. With best regards, Daniel Migowski

[BUGS] Deadlock condition in driver

2008-05-21 Thread Daniel Migowski
gnore this case, and happily send gig sized update scripts to the server in one call the driver :). Currently my solution is to increase the TCP buffer size in a copy of the PGStream class, which shadows the original class in the driver jar (bad style...). With best regards, Daniel Migo

[BUGS] BUG #5965: PostgreSQL crashes during connection

2011-04-06 Thread Daniel Migowski
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 5965 Logged by: Daniel Migowski Email address: dmigow...@ikoffice.de PostgreSQL version: 8.3.9 Operating system: Windows 7 Description:PostgreSQL crashes during connection Details: Hi, My PostgreSQL server

[BUGS] BUG #5986: pg_dump output is not ordered

2011-04-19 Thread Daniel Migowski
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 5986 Logged by: Daniel Migowski Email address: dmigow...@ikoffice.de PostgreSQL version: 8.3.14 Operating system: Many Description:pg_dump output is not ordered Details: Hi, I would love to give pg_dump an

Re: [BUGS] BUG #6325: Useless Index updates

2011-12-06 Thread Daniel Migowski
Thank you all for your explanations. I will continue this on pgsql-general. Daniel Migowski Von: Craig Ringer [ring...@ringerc.id.au] Gesendet: Sonntag, 4. Dezember 2011 15:02 Bis: Daniel Migowski Cc: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org Betreff: Re: [BUGS] BUG

[BUGS] Cannot drop database because of AUTOVACUUM

2011-12-24 Thread Daniel Migowski
he only process connected to a database when I want to drop it? Regards, Daniel Migowski

Re: [BUGS] BUG #7758: pg_dump does not correctly dump operators.

2012-12-19 Thread Daniel Migowski
The second mail just has the mailing list in CC, sorry for forgetting this before. -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Tom Lane [mailto:t...@sss.pgh.pa.us] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 19. Dezember 2012 20:09 An: Daniel Migowski Cc: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org Betreff: Re: [BUGS] BUG #7758: pg_dump does not corr