In an attempt to throw the authorities off his trail, pete...@gmx.net (Peter
Eisentraut) transmitted:
> On Thursday 21 May 2009 10:52:33 ЦелÑйко ÐмиÑÑий wrote:
>> When DDL triggers will be supported by PostgreSQL?
>
> There are currently no concrete plans for that, but if someone com
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 2600
Logged by: Christopher Browne
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: CVS HEAD (8.2)
Operating system: AIX 5.3
Description:dblink compile with SSL missing libraries
Details:
If I try to
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruce Momjian)
wrote:
> Where are we on this?
Nothing submitted so far. If someone magically does something about
it, that's super. I'm on vacation 'til Tuesday; if it's not dealt
with, I'll see if I can find something.
--
(format
In the last exciting episode, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Michael Hoffmann") wrote:
> The following bug has been logged online:
>
> Bug reference: 2608
> Logged by: Michael Hoffmann
> Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> PostgreSQL version: 8.1.2
> Operating system: AIX 5.3
> Description
Quoth [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Lane):
> I wrote:
>> Done, but it's really pretty ugly. I am thinking it'd make more sense
>> for Makefile.global to define a macro for the libraries libpq depends
>> on ...
>
> I went ahead and did this as per discussion here:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bu
Quoth [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Murali"):
> The following bug has been logged online:
>
> Bug reference: 2810
> Logged by: Murali
> Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> PostgreSQL version: 8.1.4
> Operating system: WINXP
> Description:restore to lower version of dump
> Details:
icient.
--
"cbbrowne","@","libertyrms.info"
<http://dev6.int.libertyrms.com/>
Christopher Browne
(416) 646 3304 x124 (land)
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
obably it's better to regularly do
"ordinary VACUUMs."
--
"cbbrowne","@","libertyrms.info"
<http://dev6.int.libertyrms.com/>
Christopher Browne
(416) 646 3304 x124 (land)
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
="libertyrms.info" in String.concat "@" [name;tld];;
<http://dev6.int.libertyrms.com/>
Christopher Browne
(416) 646 3304 x124 (land)
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mike Mascari) wrote:
> Lamar Owen wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday 09 March 2004 10:46 am, Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>>>Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>
BTW, I can't really see the harm in putting out 7.1.x and 7.2.x
releases to fix c
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Maxim Boguk" writes:
>> In my case vacuum tried to truncate last 10-15GB from 100Gb relation, and
>> each time (3) it was cost 10+ minutes of service downtime (because that
>> table was completely locked).
>
>> Is that correct behaviour? Are h
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Greg Stark wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 8:48 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Interesting, but I don't understand/believe your argument as to why this
>> is a bad idea or fixed-size extents are better. It sounds to me just
>> like the typical Oracle DBA compulsion to h
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 12:29 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Robert Haas writes:
>>> I think we've had a number of pieces of evidence that suggest that
>>> extending 8kB at a time is too costly, but I agree with Greg that the
>>> idea of extending an
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Christopher Browne writes:
>> - Grab timestamp
>> - Grab exclusive lock
>> - Process [Some number of pages]
>> - Check time.
>> - If [# of ms] have passed then check to see if anyone else has a lock
>> O/
2011/6/10 Luiz K. Matsumura :
> Hi,
> I need help to know if the follow scenario is a expected behaviour, a bug of
> postgres or a bug of slony:
>
> Postgres v8.4.8
> Slony-I v 2.0.5
>
> I have table replicated with slony and that do some updates in another table
> not replicated.
>
> The trigger o
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 7:23 AM, Yaamini Bist wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> It would be really great if you can provide me information Is PostGre
> compatible to RHEL 6.1 ?
This is a mailing list for addressing bugs that are found with PostgreSQL.
There isn't any such system as "PostGre", and whether that
Well, it is imaginable for there to be some side mechanism to enable use of
temporary tables on a WAL-based replica, after all, we have leapt through
enough hoops to get read transactions working.
That being said...
A) a solution for how to do this has not yet emerged, so it seems not too
likely
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 12:09 AM, Robert Young wrote:
> The basic philosophy of system design is isolation.
> One system component's crash should better not interfere others.
> System should restrict destruction to minimum.
The "minimum" may not be able to be lowered to zero.
Such a lowering may
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 4:15 AM, Nie, Guocong wrote:
> I use slony version “slony1-1.2.20” , and postgresql version 9.1
You should really take this over to the Slony mailing list, it's not a
generic Postgres problem.
http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
> LOG: server process
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 12:41 AM, wrote:
> The following bug has been logged on the website:
>
> Bug reference: 6514
> Logged by: Shanker
> Email address: sanker...@gmail.com
> PostgreSQL version: 8.4.3
> Operating system: RHEL5.5
> Description:
>
> Hi All,
> I am using Postgr
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 5:02 AM, wrote:
> The following bug has been logged on the website:
>
> Bug reference: 6516
> Logged by: Shiva
> Email address: skambhap...@tripodtech.net
> PostgreSQL version: 8.4.3
> Operating system: RHEL5.5
> Description:
>
> Hi Team,
> I installed
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 5:31 AM, Nie, Guocong wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> I am doing postgresql 9.1 replication , the Master database is on GNU/Linux
> operation system , the Slave database is on Windows 32 bit system. But
> when I copy the Master database from Linux to Windows , then I am unlucky to
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 7:15 AM, Kapil Kr. Khandelwal wrote:
> I want to a favour from your side. I want to know, how to run sql query by
> command prompt in postgres sql.
This doesn't sound like a bug, and this mailing list is intended to
capture bugs discovered in Postgres.
Perhaps you should
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 2:24 AM, Ricky Wong wrote:
> EnterpriseDB team,
>
> ** **
>
> I was wondering which Linux OS (i.e. CentOS) the Advanced Server 8.2
> supports.
>
> ** **
>
> I was able to found Documentation for 8.3 (but not 8.2):
>
> http://www.enterprisedb.com/docs/en/8.3/ser
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Kapil Kr. Khandelwal wrote:
> Dear Team
>
> I want to a favour from your side. I want to implement clustering in
> postgres on windows server. Please provide the list of steps. I want the
> answers of followings doubts.
>
> 1. How to write archive command
> 2. How
This doesn't seem either buggy or strange...
An index on the ordering of that column is not helpful in handling a
leading wildcard, and so the query optimizer will, in such cases, revert,
correctly, to using a sequential scan and filtering the results.
If you have cases where this sort of wildcar
Object names are limited to a length of NAMEDATALEN-1, which defaults to
63, and are documented to be truncated.
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/sql-syntax-lexical.html
The behaviour you are observing appears to conform to the documentation,
and seems reasonable, so I wouldn't think thi
There are several things confusing here that seem to indicate that
this is not a bug...
1. Postgres is not a web server. It is a database management system,
and thus extensions one might hope to add to a web server are not
logical to expect to connect to Postgres.
2. It sounds as though you ar
28 matches
Mail list logo
