[BUGS] Unexpected chunk number

2006-09-12 Thread Chris Purcell
sql mailing list archives, but so far can find no solution that fits; for instance, I cannot find any tables under pg_toast., so cannot use the thread at http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-admin/2005-09/msg00057.php Any help would be most appreciated! Cheers, Chris Purcell -

Re: [BUGS] Unexpected chunk number

2006-09-12 Thread Chris Purcell
"old image" - does that refer to something like an filesystem level backup or the restoration of a former pg_dump generated backup ? The former is generally NOT save (except if you followed the PITR- advises in the docs or similiar) with a running postmaster ... Ah. Yes, the former, as we did

Re: [BUGS] Unexpected chunk number

2006-09-12 Thread Chris Purcell
That will get you past the reported problem, but I wonder what other corruption is lurking ... once you've managed to pg_dump you'd better inspect the data very carefully. Would the best advice be to get a pg_dump, then drop the database entirely and rebuild it? Cheers, Chris -

Re: [BUGS] Unexpected chunk number

2006-09-12 Thread Chris Purcell
Would the best advice be to get a pg_dump, then drop the database entirely and rebuild it? Definitely. It's entirely possible for pg_dump to dump successfully from a database that still contains corruption. An example: broken indexes on user tables. COPY just does a seqscan and never looks

Re: [BUGS] Unexpected chunk number

2006-09-12 Thread Chris Purcell
See REINDEX. But my point was that there may be undetected corruption. If I were you I'd not rely on REINDEX to prevent all problems. Indeed; REINDEX neither detected nor fixed the corruption. Thanks for all your help; we'll recreate the database as soon as we can. Many tha