Name: Adam Buraczewski
Email address : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
System Configuration
-
Architecture : Intel Pentium II
Operating System : Linux 2.4.19, glibc 3.2.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu)
PostgreSQL version: PostgreSQL 7.3 RC1
Compiler used
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 06:37:09PM +0100, Adam Buraczewski wrote:
> Initdb fais with '-W' switch given in the command line.
Never mind, someone else found the bug as well, it is already removed
in CVS tree. :)
--
Adam Buraczewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Linux registered user
tches to
both original upgrade.pl and contrib/adddepend scripts.
Regards,
--
Adam Buraczewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Linux registered user #165585
GCS/TW d- s-:+>+:- a- C+++() UL$ P++ L E++ W+ N++ o? K? w--
O M- V- PS+ !PE Y PGP+ t+ 5 X+ R tv- b+ DI? D G++ e+++> h r+>
On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 02:06:31PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Adam Buraczewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I already notified the author of the program and attached patches to
> > both original upgrade.pl and contrib/adddepend scripts.
> Rod, do you concur that this
sides, I generated both patches with "diff -u" command and with some
context around :)
Regards,
--
Adam Buraczewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Linux registered user #165585
GCS/TW d- s-:+>+:- a- C+++() UL$ P++ L E++ W+ N++ o? K? w--
O M- V- PS+ !PE Y P
uld not take place. I can agree that one
should not be able to drop columns when there are some functions using
the table as an argument or return type, but it should be possible to
drop these functions, then drop some columns and create completely new
functions. And now it ends with an error
only explicitly
given in ESCAPE clause) so the backslash would be treated as an
ordinary character.
6. generally, pattern syntax should be checked more carefully during
conversion, so users would not be surprised with error messages
not connected with
ssion tests for SIMILAR TO? Is there
any guide how to do it (except PostgreSQL sources)? Should the
changes be written for CVS HEAD only or 7.4/7.3 branches either?
Regards,
--
Adam Buraczewski * Linux user #165585
GCS/TW d- s-:+>+:- a C+++() UL$ P++ L E++ W+ N++ o? K w--
O M-
> Wow, that's been broken since the beginning, apparently. There's an
> entirely bogus test in exec_stmt_getdiag():
Thanks for quick fix! :)
Best regards,
--
Adam Buraczewski
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your su
