'Bruce Momjian' writes:
> Well, we can't walk the function tree to know all called functions, and
> those they call, so we don't even try.
Inter function dependencies is a hard topic indeed. I still would like
to see some kind of progress being made someday. The general case is
turing complete th
On Oct 11, 2013, at 9:21 AM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> Inter function dependencies is a hard topic indeed. I still would like
> to see some kind of progress being made someday. The general case is
> turing complete tho, because you can use EXECUTE against programatically
> generated SQL.
>
> You
Gabriel Ciubotaru writes:
> There's a problem with expanding Bit String data types, it make
> right padding with 0 instead of left padding , making the bit mask
> almost useless.
You need to show an example of the problem; this report has no details
that would let us fix anything.
Terje Elde writes:
> Would it be possible (and make sense) to solve this in a completely different
> way, not walking the function tree or doing static analysis, but simply
> setting and checking a bit during execution?
While it's possible that we could do something like that, I think it's
fair
The following bug has been logged on the website:
Bug reference: 8518
Logged by: david
Email address: david.ku...@vsoftcorp.com
PostgreSQL version: 9.3.1
Operating system: Windows 7
Description:
Hi All,
I had tried using FreeBSD disk encryption but unable to find to
> According to the documentation, f() should be marked VOLATILE also, since
> calling f() produces side effects. PostgreSQL does not give a warning (or
> better yet, an error); I think it should.
I think the answer is that function authors are required to prevent
functions they mark as STABLE from
I know the Information Schema is a SQL standard, but it's somewhat lacking.
I was trying to write a web page that showed a db table,it's columns and
foreign keys.
All went well and I was able to get this tool working great using the
information_schema, problem is that some of the information_sche
