On 2013-03-29 14:53:26 -0700, Sergey Konoplev wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> > I have to admit, I find it a bit confusing that so many people report a
> > bug and then immediately destroy all evidence of the bug. Just seems to
> > a happen a bit too frequently.
>
The following bug has been logged on the website:
Bug reference: 8013
Logged by: Rae Stiening
Email address: stien...@comcast.net
PostgreSQL version: 9.2.3
Operating system: Suse Linux 9.3
Description:
The query:
SELECT pts_key,count(*)
FROM tm_tm_pairs GROUP
unsubscribe
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 7:01 AM, wrote:
> The following bug has been logged on the website:
>
> Bug reference: 8013
> Logged by: Rae Stiening
> Email address: stien...@comcast.net
> PostgreSQL version: 9.2.3
> Operating system: Suse Linux 9.3
> Description:
>
>
unsubscribe
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:30 PM, Sergey Konoplev wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> A couple of days ago I found the replica stopped after the PANIC message:
>
> PANIC: WAL contains references to invalid pages
>
> When I tried to restart it I got this FATAL:
>
> FATAL: could not access status
memory leak with 500 Million rows ??
sounds like to big of a db
-
-Jeff Lake K8JSL
MichiganWxSystem.com
AllisonHouse.com
TheWeatherCenter.net
GRLevelXStuff.com
On 3/30/2013 10:01, stien...@comcast.net wrote:
The following bug has been logged o