Sorry for wasting your time, I now see: If frame_end is omitted it defaults
to CURRENT ROW.
clearly in the documentation. I made the assumption that the default was
UNBOUNDED PROCEDING/FOLLOWING which is now very obviously not the case.
Again, sorry for not really taking the time to ensure this
The following bug has been logged on the website:
Bug reference: 7686
Logged by: Manoj
Email address: bontha.manoj...@tcs.com
PostgreSQL version: 9.2.1
Operating system: Windows
Description:
Dear Team,
I have installed PostgreSQL in my system and trying to connect t
Hi
Could someone provide a short howto about installing debugger for PostgreSQL
9.1 and 9.2?
Even a couple of lines would be very helpful.
I did not find pldbgapi.sql in the share/contrib folder and the
instructions that one finds online appear outdated.
Thanks in advance.
A.
--
View this m
Here is the two-lines howto for PG 9.2 for Windows.
Uncomment and edit postgresql.conf:
shared_preload_libraries = '$libdir/plugin_debugger'
NB: in 9.2 the plugin_debugger.dll is not in the (non-existing)
$libdi/plugins folder.
Restart the server.
Run CREATE EXTENSION pldbgapi;
Cheers,
A.
Is pgsql faster on linux?
Currently I've made an installation on W7 and the converted queries are
about 3 times slower then on mssql.
There's still some optimization to do tho...but the current results don't
look to good.
Ignore, wrong list...
My apologies..
Best,
Peter
2012/11/23 Peter Kroon
> Is pgsql faster on linux?
> Currently I've made an installation on W7 and the converted queries are
> about 3 times slower then on mssql.
> There's still some optimization to do tho...but the current results don't
> look
On 22-11-2012 04:27, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> 2012/11/21 Greg Sabino Mullane : Separately, what are
> the objections to raising the size limit to 128?
>
>> significantly larger catalog
>
Less than 5% of catalog columns? I don't buy your argument.
--
Euler Taveira de Oliveira - Timbira h
2012/11/23 Euler Taveira :
> On 22-11-2012 04:27, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>> 2012/11/21 Greg Sabino Mullane : Separately, what are
>> the objections to raising the size limit to 128?
>>
>>> significantly larger catalog
>>
> Less than 5% of catalog columns? I don't buy your argument.
default 6201kB (6
Euler Taveira writes:
> On 22-11-2012 04:27, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>>> significantly larger catalog
> Less than 5% of catalog columns? I don't buy your argument.
It's not about count, it's about size. For instance, pg_attribute
currently requires 140 bytes per row (counting the tuple header and
On 23.11.2012 17:53, Tom Lane wrote:
Euler Taveira writes:
On 22-11-2012 04:27, Pavel Stehule wrote:
significantly larger catalog
Less than 5% of catalog columns? I don't buy your argument.
It's not about count, it's about size. For instance, pg_attribute
currently requires 140 bytes per
Heikki Linnakangas writes:
> On 23.11.2012 17:53, Tom Lane wrote:
>> We could avoid this problem if we were prepared to make type "name"
>> be varlena, ...
> It would actually be nice to do that because it would *reduce* the
> amount of space and memory used for the catalogs in the typical case
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 11:23:13AM +, bernhard.schra...@innogames.de wrote:
> To point this out, postgresql 9.0 and 9.2 are not running, if 9.0 is
> running, the 9.0 tests succeed, but afaik they shouldn't running, or at
> least 9.2 shouldn't running during upgrade, but without the link to the
12 matches
Mail list logo
