Tom Lane writes:
>I concluded that it probably wasn't a good idea to have the additional
state transition in SIGINT handling. Generally >PM_STARTUP means "we're
running the startup process and nothing else", and that's useful state info
that we shouldn't >throw away lightly.
I tested the patch,
Hari Babu writes:
> I have a query regarding the changing of pmState only incase of SIGTERM but
> not incase of SIGINT.
> Is there any reason to handle like this? or Is it ok to modify the handling
> of pmState in SIGTERM same as SIGINT?
AFAICT the "smart shutdown" code path is okay: it transitio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Gavin Flower asks:
> Would it be appropriate to make it a WARNING in 9.2.2, then
> increase the length in 9.3?
No: revisions are reserved for bug fixes. This would be more of
a behavior fix and as such would go into a major version.
Gavan Sc
2012/11/21 Greg Sabino Mullane :
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: RIPEMD160
>
> Gavin Flower asks:
>
>> Would it be appropriate to make it a WARNING in 9.2.2, then
>> increase the length in 9.3?
>
> No: revisions are reserved for bug fixes. This would be more of
> a behavior fix and a
