On 21.09.2012 14:18, Amit kapila wrote:
On Tuesday, September 18, 2012 6:02 PM Fujii Masao wrote:
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Amit Kapila wrote:
Approach-2 :
Provide a variable wal_send_status_interval, such that if this is 0, then
the current behavior would prevail and if its non-zero th
Apologies for delay in progressing this, but I only have access to an
AIX7.1 system periodically.
Just to confirm that source build of 9.2.1 release now builds clean
against AIXv7.1 with xlc v12.1 compiler.
Thanks,
Andrew
On 31/08/12 20:20, Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Hastie writes:
On 31/08
Apologies for delay in progressing this, but I only have access to an
AIX7.1 system periodically.
Just to confirm that source build of 9.2.1 release now builds clean
against AIXv7.1 with xlc v12.1 compiler.
Thanks,
Andrew
On 31/08/12 20:20, Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Hastie writes:
On 31/08
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 01:18:26AM +, maxim.bo...@gmail.com wrote:
> The following bug has been logged on the website:
>
> Bug reference: 7573
> Logged by: Maxim Boguk
> Email address: maxim.bo...@gmail.com
> PostgreSQL version: 9.2.0
> Operating system: Linux
> Descriptio
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 6:38 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
wrote:
> Hmm, I think we need to step back a bit. I've never liked the way
> replication_timeout works, where it's the user's responsibility to set
> wal_receiver_status_interval < replication_timeout. It's not very
> user-friendly. I'd rather not
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 7:38 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
wrote:
> Hmm, I think we need to step back a bit. I've never liked the way
> replication_timeout works, where it's the user's responsibility to set
> wal_receiver_status_interval < replication_timeout. It's not very
> user-friendly. I'd rather not
Does anyone know of any known issues (show-stoppers) with upgrading to
Postgresql 9.2 but retaining Postgis 1.5.3 or Postgis 1.5.5?
Thanks
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Fujii Masao wrote:
> I believe many users are basically familiar with TCP keepalives and how to
> specify it. So I think that this approach would be intuitive to users.
My experience is that many users are unfamiliar with TCP keepalives
and that when given the opt
Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of lun oct 01 21:02:54 -0300 2012:
> On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Fujii Masao wrote:
> > I believe many users are basically familiar with TCP keepalives and how to
> > specify it. So I think that this approach would be intuitive to users.
>
> My experience
Excerpts from urvancevav's message of vie sep 28 05:58:42 -0300 2012:
> The following bug has been logged on the website:
>
> Bug reference: 7574
> Logged by: Andrei
> Email address: urvance...@gmail.com
> PostgreSQL version: 9.2.1
> Operating system: 3.2.0-31-generic #50-Ubun
10 matches
Mail list logo