The following bug has been logged on the website:
Bug reference: 7526
Logged by: Dan
Email address: s3n_...@yahoo.com
PostgreSQL version: 8.4.7
Operating system: Windows Vista Home Premium
Description:
Please help me with this error, i tried everything i found for thi
The following bug has been logged on the website:
Bug reference: 7527
Logged by: Ronaldo Souza
Email address: rona...@gpiti.com.br
PostgreSQL version: 9.0.6
Operating system: Windows XP
Description:
I'd like to debug postgresql functions, set postgresql.conf with
shar
Marko Tiikkaja writes:
> On 03/09/2012 18:06, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Hm. Is it possible that the prepared statement recursively called the
>> *same* plperl function? And that somebody did a CREATE OR REPLACE on
>> that function meanwhile?
> No, that doesn't seem possible in this case. The function
I wrote:
> Hm. Well, I can definitely reproduce a segfault using this example:
> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION self_modify(INTEGER) RETURNS INTEGER AS $$
>spi_exec_query('CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION self_modify(INTEGER) RETURNS
> INTEGER AS \'return $_[0] * 3;\' LANGUAGE plperl;');
>spi_exec
On 09/09/12 14:01, Kevin Grittner wrote:
wrote:
The TWO most important factors in hindering us to convert to
Postgres are the following:
Parallel execution of queries.
No Table Partitioning
Not a bug, so off-topic for this list. If you need help figuring
out how best to use PostgreSQL, or
On 09/09/12 6:04 PM, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
1/ What is the current state of table partitioning...is anyone working
on something a bit more native than abusing inheritance?
enterpriseDB's commercial 'oracle compatible' fork has the Oracle DDL
for creating and managing partitions, but afaik, it us
On 09/09/12 9:31 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
2/ Is anyone working on parallel query execution?
someone presented a FOSS project on the pg-general list the other day
that implements parallel execution using a postgres based engine, but
it only supports fairly simple queries. I can't say I reme
