The following bug has been logged on the website:
Bug reference: 6742
Logged by: Alexander LAW
Email address: exclus...@gmail.com
PostgreSQL version: 9.1.4
Operating system: Windows
Description:
When I try to dump database with UTF-8 encoding in Windows, I get unreada
exclus...@gmail.com, 18.07.2012 09:17:
The following bug has been logged on the website:
Bug reference: 6742
Logged by: Alexander LAW
Email address: exclus...@gmail.com
PostgreSQL version: 9.1.4
Operating system: Windows
Description:
When I try to dump database with UTF-8 e
Hello,
The dump file itself is correct. The issue is only with the non-ASCII
object names in pg_dump messages.
The messages text (which is non-ASCII too) displayed consistently with
right encoding (i.e. with OS encoding thanks to libintl/gettext), but
encoding of db object names depends on the
Hello!
May I to propose a solution and to step up?
I've read a discussion of the bug #5800 and here is my 2 cents.
To make things clear let me give an example.
I am a PostgreSQL hosting provider and I let my customers to create any
databases they wish.
I have clients all over the world (so they
Tom, after patching pg_upgrade now runs successfully. I noticed that this
patch had been applied since yesterday to the REL9_2_STABLE so I also tested
with a git pull without the patch that appears to work also. I think issue has
been resolved for me, thanks so much! You guys rock!
Mike Wils
> C. We have one logfile with UTF-8.
> Pros: Log messages of all our clients can fit in it. We can use any
> generic editor/viewer to open it.
> Nothing changes for Linux (and other OSes with UTF-8 encoding).
> Cons: All the strings written to log file should go through some
> conversation function
Tatsuo Ishii writes:
> My idea is using mule-internal encoding for the log file instead of
> UTF-8. There are several advantages:
> 1) Converion to mule-internal encoding is cheap because no conversion
>table is required. Also no information loss happens in this
>conversion.
> 2) Mule-in
> Tatsuo Ishii writes:
>> My idea is using mule-internal encoding for the log file instead of
>> UTF-8. There are several advantages:
>
>> 1) Converion to mule-internal encoding is cheap because no conversion
>>table is required. Also no information loss happens in this
>>conversion.
>
>
On 07/18/2012 11:16 PM, Alexander Law wrote:
Hello!
May I to propose a solution and to step up?
I've read a discussion of the bug #5800 and here is my 2 cents.
To make things clear let me give an example.
I am a PostgreSQL hosting provider and I let my customers to create
any databases they wi
The following bug has been logged on the website:
Bug reference: 6743
Logged by: Spătărel Dan
Email address: spatar...@yahoo.com
PostgreSQL version: 9.1.4
Operating system: Windows Vista SP2
Description:
I use "UTF8" charset and "Romania, Romanian" locale.
I came acr
Hello,
C. We have one logfile with UTF-8.
Pros: Log messages of all our clients can fit in it. We can use any
generic editor/viewer to open it.
Nothing changes for Linux (and other OSes with UTF-8 encoding).
Cons: All the strings written to log file should go through some
conversation function.
11 matches
Mail list logo