On 05/04/2012 06:46 AM, milen_laza...@yahoo.com wrote:
The following bug has been logged on the website:
Bug reference: 6625
Logged by: Milen
Email address: milen_laza...@yahoo.com
PostgreSQL version: 8.3.0
Operating system: windows xp
Description:
i can't complete the inst
On 05/23/2012 04:00 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 5:43 AM, wrote:
The following bug has been logged on the website:
Bug reference: 6647
Logged by: Subramanian
Email address: subu@gmail.com
PostgreSQL version: 9.1.3
Operating system: Windows XP
Descript
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 5:00 AM, Craig Ringer wrote:
> On 05/23/2012 04:00 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 5:43 AM, wrote:
>>>
>>> The following bug has been logged on the website:
>>>
>>> Bug reference: 6647
>>> Logged by: Subramanian
>>> Email address: su
The following bug has been logged on the website:
Bug reference: 6667
Logged by: Dmitry Turin
Email address: dmitrytu...@narod.ru
PostgreSQL version: Unsupported/Unknown
Operating system: windows
Description:
Excuse me, that i forced to ask via this form, but i did no
Hi I am created a function
CREATE FUNCTION one(float,float) RETURNS float AS $$
select $1+$2 AS result;
$$ LANGUAGE SQL;
Its worked
Then
I droped the function
Drop function one(float,float)
Its also worked
Then I typed
Select one(18.5,12.4)
Ho… the result appers as 31.9
Fijil Stephen writes:
> Hi I am created a function
> CREATE FUNCTION one(float,float) RETURNS float AS $$
> select $1+$2 AS result;
> $$ LANGUAGE SQL;
> Its worked
> Then
> I droped the function
> Drop function one(float,float)
> Its also worked
> Then I typed
>Select one(1
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 8:37 PM, Thangalin wrote:
> Hi, Robert.
>
> $ psql --version
> psql (PostgreSQL) 9.1.2
>
> D J
[rhaas ~]$ createdb superdatabase
[rhaas ~]$ psql superdatabase
Line style is old-ascii.
psql (9.1.2)
Type "help" for help.
superdatabase=# create schema superschema;
CREATE SCH
Andrew Dunstan writes:
>>> Martin Pitt mailto:mp...@debian.org>> writes:
while packaging 9.2 beta 1 for Debian/Ubuntu the postgresql-common
test suite noticed a regression: It seems that pg_restore --data-only
now skips the current value of sequences, so that in the upgraded
da
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 11:49:31AM -0700, Adrian Klaver wrote:
> >
> > If you can help me find out how these got defined this way, I might be
> > able to prevent this problem for the next person.
> >
>
> After reading the above thread here is what the queries mentioned return:
>
> production=#
On 05/24/2012 11:14 AM, gilsonla...@yahoo.com wrote:
The following bug has been logged on the website:
Bug reference: 6663
Logged by: Gilson Lasco
Email address: gilsonla...@yahoo.com
PostgreSQL version: 9.1.3
Operating system: Linux Ubuntu 12.04 x64
Description:
while PQco
On 05/29/2012 05:44 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 11:49:31AM -0700, Adrian Klaver wrote:
If you can help me find out how these got defined this way, I might be
able to prevent this problem for the next person.
After reading the above thread here is what the queries mention
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 07:13:24PM -0700, Adrian Klaver wrote:
> >This moved the helper functions into pg_catalog, but the author probably
> >didn't realize that public schema helper functions would continue to be
> >dumped by pg_dump. These helper functions continued to be
> >dumped/restored unti
12 matches
Mail list logo
