Re: [BUGS] BUG #6661: out-of-order XID insertion in KnownAssignedXids

2012-05-23 Thread Valentine Gogichashvili
> > > 2012-05-22 21:20:27.868 CEST,,,23804,,4fbbe69e.5cfc,130,,2012-05-22 > > 21:18:54 CEST,1/0,0,FATAL,XX000,"out-of-order XID insertion in > > KnownAssignedXids","xlog redo running xacts: nextXid 3674728633 > > latestCompletedXid 3674728632 oldestRunningXid 3674726497; 4 xacts: > > 367472704

Re: [BUGS] PostgreSQL 9.2 beta1's pg_upgrade fails on Windows XP

2012-05-23 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 5:50 AM, Edmund Horner wrote: > On 22 May 2012 18:49, Craig Ringer wrote: >> When you shut down the 9.1.3 cluster did you make absolutely certain there >> were no postgres.exe processes lurking around when you tested? Given the >> incredible thouroughness of your report I

Re: [BUGS] BUG #6650: CPU system time utilization rising few times a day

2012-05-23 Thread Andrzej Krawiec
Cannot strace or gdb on a production system under heavy load (about 100 transactions per second). It's in kernel space not user, so we are unable to anything at this particular moment (sometimes even the ssh connection seems to hang for a while). We suspect neither autovacuum (although suspected pr

Re: [BUGS] BUG #6661: out-of-order XID insertion in KnownAssignedXids

2012-05-23 Thread Andres Freund
On Wednesday, May 23, 2012 12:30:31 PM Valentine Gogichashvili wrote: > > > CEST,,0,LOG,0,"startup process (PID 23804) exited with exit code > > > 1","" > > > 2012-05-22 21:20:27.939 CEST,,,23793,,4fbbe69e.5cf1,2,,2012-05-22 > > > 21:18:54 CEST,,0,LOG,0,"terminating any other activ

Re: [BUGS] BUG #6661: out-of-order XID insertion in KnownAssignedXids

2012-05-23 Thread Andres Freund
On Wednesday, May 23, 2012 06:27:48 PM Andres Freund wrote: > On Wednesday, May 23, 2012 12:30:31 PM Valentine Gogichashvili wrote: > > > > CEST,,0,LOG,0,"startup process (PID 23804) exited with exit code > > > > 1","" > > > > 2012-05-22 21:20:27.939 CEST,,,23793,,4fbbe69e.5cf1,2,,2012-

Re: [BUGS] BUG #6661: out-of-order XID insertion in KnownAssignedXids

2012-05-23 Thread Andres Freund
On Wednesday, May 23, 2012 12:30:31 PM Valentine Gogichashvili wrote: > > > 2012-05-22 21:20:27.868 CEST,,,23804,,4fbbe69e.5cfc,130,,2012-05-22 > > > 21:18:54 CEST,1/0,0,FATAL,XX000,"out-of-order XID insertion in > > > KnownAssignedXids","xlog redo running xacts: nextXid 3674728633 > > > lates

Re: [BUGS] BUG #6661: out-of-order XID insertion in KnownAssignedXids

2012-05-23 Thread Valentine Gogichashvili
Hello Andres, Do you have both, longrunning transactions and transactions with many > subtransactions? > > Yes long running plane SQL queries as well as many short SQL queries running one after another in one long spanning transaction (we are working on eliminating this kind of behavior, but it is

Re: [BUGS] BUG #6660: losing schema name in pg_dump

2012-05-23 Thread Chaitany Kulkarni
Sorry for the late reply. But after comparing output results of pg_dump and other tools in SQL format, I think it will helpful if an another switch is provided in pg_dump to output data and definition of objects of only given type. e.g. pg_dump --type views It will export only views in given form

Re: [BUGS] BUG #6650: CPU system time utilization rising few times a day

2012-05-23 Thread Robert Haas
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 5:29 AM, Andrzej Krawiec wrote: > Cannot strace or gdb on a production system under heavy load (about 100 > transactions per second). > It's in kernel space not user, so we are unable to anything at this > particular moment (sometimes even the ssh connection seems to hang f

Re: [BUGS] PostgreSQL 9.2 beta1's pg_upgrade fails on Windows XP

2012-05-23 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 03:20:30PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 5:50 AM, Edmund Horner wrote: > > On 22 May 2012 18:49, Craig Ringer wrote: > >> When you shut down the 9.1.3 cluster did you make absolutely certain there > >> were no postgres.exe processes lurking around

Re: [BUGS] PostgreSQL 9.2 beta1's pg_upgrade fails on Windows XP

2012-05-23 Thread Edmund Horner
On 24 May 2012 12:33, Bruce Momjian wrote: > I have applied the attached patch which should fix the problem.   How > can we get Edmund a copy of a new binary for testing?  Does he have to > wait for beta2? My uneducated guess is that your patch will fix the problem. But I don't think I'm up to c