2012-04-14 18:15 keltezéssel, Peter Eisentraut írta:
On lör, 2012-04-14 at 08:23 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 3:27 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
It has a lot of sense. Without it, it's very difficult to do logical
replication on a table with no primary key.
(Whether or not pe
2012/4/15 Boszormenyi Zoltan :
> 2012-04-14 18:15 keltezéssel, Peter Eisentraut írta:
>
>> On lör, 2012-04-14 at 08:23 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 3:27 AM, Pavel Stehule
>>> wrote:
>
> It has a lot of sense. Without it, it's very difficult to do logical
>
Robert Haas writes:
> On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 2:39 AM, Hitoshi Harada wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 8:00 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Given the lack of complaints since 9.0, maybe we should not fix this
>>> but just redefine the new behavior as being correct? But it seems
>>> mighty inconsistent t
