On 8 Feb 2012, at 10:01, Duncan Rance wrote:
> On 6 Feb 2012, at 20:48, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> bug reports. Please see if you can break REL9_0_STABLE branch tip
>
> Just to let you know that I built this yesterday and I'm giving it a good
> battering in our Solaris 10 Sparc test environment.
In
Duncan Rance writes:
> Our customers are keen to get the official release as soon as possible. They
> are on 9.0.6, so I guess this'll be 9.0.7? I'm new here so I don't know how
> long this might take, and I promised I'll find out for them. Any ideas?
There's no firm plan at the moment. The ea
On 9 Feb 2012, at 15:02, Tom Lane wrote:
> Duncan Rance writes:
>> Our customers are keen to get the official release as soon as possible. They
>> are on 9.0.6, so I guess this'll be 9.0.7? I'm new here so I don't know how
>> long this might take, and I promised I'll find out for them. Any idea
The following bug has been logged on the website:
Bug reference: 6450
Logged by: Vipul Patel
Email address: vipul.pa...@elitecore.com
PostgreSQL version: 8.4.5
Operating system: linux
Description:
hi,
I am using the PostgreSQL 8.4.5, I wrote C programm which Creat
The following bug has been logged on the website:
Bug reference: 6451
Logged by: srinivas
Email address: srinivas...@gmail.com
PostgreSQL version: 9.0.6
Operating system: redhat linux
Description:
[enterprisedb@DBServer2 bin]$ ./gs-server.sh
Starting
./gs-server.s
wrote:
> some time call of create table is stuck which is called by PQexec.
What locks and blocking do you see when this happens?
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Lock_Monitoring'
Have you considered getting an explicit lock with NOWAIT at the
start of your transaction, to test whether you
On 02/08/12 10:32 PM, srinivas...@gmail.com wrote:
The following bug has been logged on the website:
Bug reference: 6451
Logged by: srinivas
Email address: srinivas...@gmail.com
PostgreSQL version: 9.0.6
Operating system: redhat linux
Description:
[enterprisedb@DBServer2 bi
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 2:01 PM, wrote:
> The following bug has been logged on the website:
>
> Bug reference: 6444
> Logged by: Petr Jediný
> Email address: petr.jed...@gmail.com
> PostgreSQL version: 8.4.10
> Operating system: Debian 6 Squeeze, 64bit
> Description:
>
> Postg
Hello,
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 2:01 PM, wrote:
>> The following bug has been logged on the website:
>>
>> Bug reference: 6444
>> Logged by: Petr Jediný
>> Email address: petr.jed...@gmail.com
>> PostgreSQL version: 8.4.10
>>
On 09-02-2012 17:26, Petr Jediný wrote:
> If it's still needed I can provide the table dump, it's about 543M gziped.
>
No, that bug was already fixed in our repository. I advise you to stay with
8.4.9 until 8.4.11 is released (in a month or so) unless you are suffering
with another bug that was fi
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 11:57:28AM +, ajit.pradnyav...@gmail.com wrote:
> The following bug has been logged on the website:
>
> Bug reference: 6433
> Logged by: ajit
> Email address: ajit.pradnyav...@gmail.com
> PostgreSQL version: 8.3.0
> Operating system: windows Xp SP 3
>
>
> PG 8.2 is no longer supported; get a newer version.
>
>
+1 :-)
> --
> Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us
> EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
>
> + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@pos
12 matches
Mail list logo
