Dave Page, 04.10.2011 21:46:
We updated our build system to use BitRock 7 today (for unrelated
reasons) which has new features for ACL management. We're going to
investigate replacing cacls/icacls with those features tomorrow and
will create some test builds ASAP.
If you can provide the test bu
Tom Lane wrote:
However, the flaw in that explanation is that it would basically mean
pg_dump doesn't work at all on Windows, at least not if you have any
user-defined functions, and probably some other cases too because there
seem to be multiple instances of the dubious coding. It's a bit hard
On Wednesday, October 5, 2011, Thomas Kellerer wrote:
> Dave Page, 04.10.2011 21:46:
>>
>> We updated our build system to use BitRock 7 today (for unrelated
>> reasons) which has new features for ACL management. We're going to
>> investigate replacing cacls/icacls with those features tomorrow and
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 6240
Logged by: Chethan HB
Email address: chethanbasava...@gmail.com
PostgreSQL version: 9.0.4
Operating system: Linux
Description:About - postgreswdinit.sql
Details:
In a freshly commissioned h/w, when watchd
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 09:24, Craig Ringer wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>> However, the flaw in that explanation is that it would basically mean
>> pg_dump doesn't work at all on Windows, at least not if you have any
>> user-defined functions, and probably some other cases too because there
>> seem
Hi,
In a freshly commissioned h/w, when watchdog is created for the first
time, I faced some problem.
I never faced this problem earlier.
Currenlty we are using the following version:
export PGODBC_VERSION=psqlodbc-09.00.0300
Postgres version=9.0.4
Logs are attached here:
Jan 1 02:05:09.49273
> Hi,
>
> In a freshly commissioned h/w, when watchdog is created for the first
> time, I faced some problem.
>
> I never faced this problem earlier.
>
> Currenlty we are using the following version:
> export PGODBC_VERSION=psqlodbc-09.00.0300
> Postgres version=9.0.4
>
> Logs are attached her
2011/9/26 Alvaro Herrera
>
> Please see if bug #6123 applies to this case.
> http://www.mail-archive.com/pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org/msg181541.html
I guess, yes, it's related, because we had a trigger that deletes a row,
while other foreign key constraint is updating the row setting null.
But
-Original Message-
From: Tom Lane [mailto:t...@sss.pgh.pa.us]
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2011 6:07 AM
To: Alvaro Herrera
Cc: Pavel Holec; 'Craig Ringer'; Pg Bugs
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #6233: pg_dump hangs with Access Violation C005
Alvaro Herrera writes:
> Excerpts from Tom Lane'
Excerpts from Daniel Cristian Cruz's message of mié oct 05 10:00:36 -0300 2011:
> 2011/9/26 Alvaro Herrera
>
> >
> > Please see if bug #6123 applies to this case.
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org/msg181541.html
>
>
> I guess, yes, it's related, because we had a trig
"Chethan HB" writes:
> Jan 1 02:05:10.531239 warn CLA-0 postgres[9919]: [2-1] ERROR: could not
> create file "base/16384/11500": File exists [This error is from
> postgres
> server]
> Jan 1 02:05:10.531317 warn CLA-0 postgres[9919]: [2-2] STATEMENT: create
> database postgreswd;
Th
2011/10/5 Alvaro Herrera
> Well, some people say it's a bug, others say it's not; and even if it
> is, changing it means backwards incompatible behavior, so *if* it is
> patched, it will only change the behavior on a future release, not
> whatever you're using.
Well, I'll try to explain better,
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of mar oct 04 10:39:27 -0300 2011:
> > On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 8:15 AM, Michael Meskes
> > wrote:
>
> > >> 2010 on Windows, which accepts "long long" to mean the same thing as
> > >> __int64, but ECPG doesn't recognize the later.
> >
Daniel Cristian Cruz writes:
> 2011/10/5 Alvaro Herrera
>> Well, some people say it's a bug, others say it's not; and even if it
>> is, changing it means backwards incompatible behavior, so *if* it is
>> patched, it will only change the behavior on a future release, not
>> whatever you're using.
On 10/05/2011 09:37 PM, Pavel Holec wrote:
Yes, this is the problem. libpq.dll I have built in VC6. With original I had
problem with msvcr80.dll and WinSxS because my end client app is also from
VC6 and I can't prepare redist msvcr for end user. Can you advice me how to
do it?
It would've been
Thanks, Tom. Now I got it.
I didn't tryed to change BEFORE to AFTER, but reminded something I learned
coding triggers a long time ago, and I forgot. This could be a fortune:
"The rough rule of thumb is that BEFORE triggers are good for adjusting
the contents of the row that's about to be stored,
16 matches
Mail list logo
