Re: [BUGS] [GENERAL] One-click installer, Windows 7 32-bit, and icacls.exe

2011-10-03 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 15:34, Karl Wright wrote: > I saw a thread where somebody saw icacls.exe being called by the > one-click installer.  I'm having the same thing - the installer has > been running for 45 minutes now and is basically going to have to be > stopped because I'm out of time waitin

Re: [BUGS] [GENERAL] One-click installer, Windows 7 32-bit, and icacls.exe

2011-10-03 Thread Dave Page
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 15:34, Karl Wright wrote: >> I saw a thread where somebody saw icacls.exe being called by the >> one-click installer.  I'm having the same thing - the installer has >> been running for 45 minutes now and is basically

Re: [BUGS] [GENERAL] One-click installer, Windows 7 32-bit, and icacls.exe

2011-10-03 Thread Thomas Kellerer
Dave Page wrote on 03.10.2011 10:11: Karl; can you please provide precise details of your Windows version, and anything unusual about your disk configuration? I know this doesn't happen on any of the installations of Windows 7 that we use for testing (which tend to be the MSDN builds, running on

[BUGS] bug in dependency - there is possibility to break a system catalog

2011-10-03 Thread Pavel Stehule
Hello our customer reported a broken system dictionary. The following statements breaks a catalog: postgres=# CREATE TYPE test_type AS (a integer, b integer); CREATE TYPE Time: 61,016 ms postgres=# postgres=# CREATE FUNCTION test_func (variadic x text[] = '{NULL}'::"test_type"[]) postgres-# RETU

Re: [BUGS] BUG #6233: pg_dump hangs with Access Violation C0000005

2011-10-03 Thread Pavel Holec
On 09/29/2011 05:18 AM, Holec wrote: > > The following bug has been logged online: > > Bug reference: 6233 > Logged by: Holec > Email address: ho...@email.cz > PostgreSQL version: 8.4.8 > Operating system: Windows 7 > Description:pg_dump hangs with Access Violation C000

Re: [BUGS] [GENERAL] One-click installer, Windows 7 32-bit, and icacls.exe

2011-10-03 Thread Dave Page
Thanks Karl. Is SP1 installed? Sachin, Ashesh - anything else you can think of that would be useful? On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Karl Wright wrote: > Sorry for the delay - it's been a busy morning. > > The Windows 7 system I'm using is a laptop with a standard basic Nokia > image.  To the bes

Re: [BUGS] [GENERAL] One-click installer, Windows 7 32-bit, and icacls.exe

2011-10-03 Thread Dave Page
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Thomas Kellerer wrote: > Dave Page wrote on 03.10.2011 10:11: >> >> Karl; can you please provide precise details of your Windows version, >> and anything unusual about your disk configuration? I know this >> doesn't happen on any of the installations of Windows 7 th

Re: [BUGS] [GENERAL] One-click installer, Windows 7 32-bit, and icacls.exe

2011-10-03 Thread Dave Page
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 2:39 PM, wrote: > I am running Windows 7 x64 (version 6.1.7601). My copy is also from the > MSDN with latest updates applied. When I get to the end of the postgres > install I get a error: > > Problem running post-install step. Installation may not complete > correctly.

Re: [BUGS] [GENERAL] One-click installer, Windows 7 32-bit, and icacls.exe

2011-10-03 Thread mgould
<<< text/html; charset="utf-8": Unrecognized >>> <>

Re: [BUGS] [GENERAL] One-click installer, Windows 7 32-bit, and icacls.exe

2011-10-03 Thread Karl Wright
I see no evidence that SP1 is installed on this machine. Karl On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Dave Page wrote: > Thanks Karl. Is SP1 installed? Sachin, Ashesh - anything else you can > think of that would be useful? > > On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Karl Wright wrote: >> Sorry for the delay -

Re: [BUGS] [GENERAL] One-click installer, Windows 7 32-bit, and icacls.exe

2011-10-03 Thread Karl Wright
Sorry for the delay - it's been a busy morning. The Windows 7 system I'm using is a laptop with a standard basic Nokia image. To the best of my knowledge there have been no OEM modifications of any kind. It describes itself as "Windows 7 Enterprise", and says it is 32-bit. That's it. Anything

Re: [BUGS] bug in dependency - there is possibility to break a system catalog

2011-10-03 Thread Tom Lane
Pavel Stehule writes: > [ we forgot to record dependencies on function default expressions ] Fixed, thanks for the report. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/m

[BUGS] BUG #6237: Hang during install database initialization

2011-10-03 Thread Jim Gray
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 6237 Logged by: Jim Gray Email address: jim.g...@bull.com PostgreSQL version: 9.1.1 Operating system: Windows Vista Description:Hang during install database initialization Details: The only PostgreSQL release

[BUGS] BUG #6238: ECPG converts "long long" to long on Windows

2011-10-03 Thread Jim Gray
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 6238 Logged by: Jim Gray Email address: jim.g...@bull.com PostgreSQL version: 9.1.1 Operating system: Windows XP Description:ECPG converts "long long" to long on Windows Details: Postgres 9.1.1 installed on a

Re: [BUGS] BUG #6237: Hang during install database initialization

2011-10-03 Thread Craig Ringer
On Oct 4, 2011 4:30 AM, "Jim Gray" wrote: > > > The following bug has been logged online: > > Bug reference: 6237 > Logged by: Jim Gray > Email address: jim.g...@bull.com > PostgreSQL version: 9.1.1 > Operating system: Windows Vista > Description:Hang during install da

Re: [BUGS] BUG #6234: Memory leak from PQexec

2011-10-03 Thread Craig Ringer
On Oct 4, 2011 2:14 AM, "Vikas Mehta" wrote: > > Thanks. I found posts on SSL leak reported by purify. However, I couldn't find any information on the memory leak from PQrequestCancel. Is it a known issue? It's essentially the same issue. OpenSSL loads some strings, config variables etc on demand

Re: [BUGS] BUG #6233: pg_dump hangs with Access Violation C0000005

2011-10-03 Thread Craig Ringer
On 03/10/11 19:42, Pavel Holec wrote: > On 09/29/2011 05:18 AM, Holec wrote: >> >> The following bug has been logged online: >> >> Bug reference: 6233 >> Logged by: Holec >> Email address: ho...@email.cz >> PostgreSQL version: 8.4.8 >> Operating system: Windows 7 >> Description

Re: [BUGS] BUG #6234: Memory leak from PQexec

2011-10-03 Thread Vikas Mehta
Thanks. I found posts on SSL leak reported by purify. However, I couldn't find any information on the memory leak from PQrequestCancel. Is it a known issue? -Original Message- From: Craig Ringer [mailto:ring...@ringerc.id.au] Sent: Friday, September 30, 2011 12:02 AM To: Vikas Mehta Cc:

[BUGS] BUG #6239: Looking for a technical contact point for PostgreSQL compatibility issue on Windows8

2011-10-03 Thread Seiko Ishida
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 6239 Logged by: Seiko Ishida Email address: v-sei...@microsoft.com PostgreSQL version: 8.2.4 Operating system: Windows 8 Description:Looking for a technical contact point for PostgreSQL compatibility issue on Wi

Re: [BUGS] BUG #6239: Looking for a technical contact point for PostgreSQL compatibility issue on Windows8

2011-10-03 Thread Jaime Casanova
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 8:42 PM, Seiko Ishida wrote: > > The following bug has been logged online: > > Bug reference:      6239 > Logged by:          Seiko Ishida > Email address:      v-sei...@microsoft.com > PostgreSQL version: 8.2.4 > Operating system:   Windows 8 > Description:        Looking f

Re: [BUGS] BUG #6239: Looking for a technical contact point for PostgreSQL compatibility issue on Windows8

2011-10-03 Thread Craig Ringer
On 04/10/11 09:42, Seiko Ishida wrote: > PostgreSQL version: 8.2.4 > Operating system: Windows 8 >From the PostgreSQL release notes: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/interactive/release-8-2-22.html "The PostgreSQL community will stop releasing updates for the 8.2.X release series in Decembe