I noticed this typo in a comment in the file nbtsort.c:
/*
* We need to log index creation in WAL iff WAL archiving/streaming is
* enabled UNLESS the index isn't WAL-logged anyway.
*/
I suggest an s/iff/if/
--
Peter Geoghegan http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Sup
Peter Geoghegan writes:
> I noticed this typo in a comment in the file nbtsort.c:
> /*
> * We need to log index creation in WAL iff WAL archiving/streaming is
> * enabled UNLESS the index isn't WAL-logged anyway.
> */
> I suggest an s/iff/if/
This is not a typo, it's the standard contraction
On 1/10/2011 3:35 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
If you delete from the base table then the DELETE succeeds (the row is
deleted), but the referenced row is not deleted. This might make sense to
someone who knows how inheritance is implemented, but it wasn't immediately
obvious to me. It would be nice if thi
* Henk Enting (h.d.ent...@mgrid.net) wrote:
> But still, I think the to_timestamp should throw an error if I put in
> something like '21-21-2011'.
I agree completely, this is a pretty big bug in my opinion. We don't
accept invalid or garbage timestamps in the input function, I don't see
any reaso
