Re: [BUGS] BUG #5809: bigserial duplicate value

2011-01-09 Thread melzaiady
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/file/n3332998/data1.jpg this picture of screen you can new sequence of value. now how can i slove this problem and this field dont start new squences in any time ? -- View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/BUG-5809-bigser

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5816: index not used in function

2011-01-09 Thread frank
Kevin, Very thrilled to hear back from you (and surprised at the promptness, too)! Please do not take this personal as it is a tech issue and I am treating it thus. We may have different perceptions of something being a 'bug'. I always have several simple ways of determining it. One of them is w

Re: [BUGS] BUG #4806: Bug with GiST index and empty integer array?

2011-01-09 Thread Tom Lane
"Joerg Kiegeland" writes: > The following bug has been logged online: > Bug reference: 4806 > Logged by: Joerg Kiegeland > Email address: kiegel...@ikv.de > PostgreSQL version: PostgreSQL8.3.7 > Operating system: Windows XP > Description:Bug with GiST index and empty

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5816: index not used in function

2011-01-09 Thread Korry Douglas
> We may have different perceptions of something being a 'bug'. I always > have several simple ways of determining it. One of them is when a > work-around is in the proposal. Yours is one. It seems to me that the important question in this case is whether or not the query produced the correct res