On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Kaiting Chen" writes:
>> From this pg_hba configuration as the user 'kaiting.chen' is not in role
>> 'service' the second entry in the table should be skipped and he should
>> authenticate via GSSAPI. However this does not happen.
>
> I believe
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Jonathan Pool wrote:
> Chapter 35.4, paragraph 4, of the PostgreSQL 9.0.1 Documentation says:
>
> Any collection of commands in the SQL language can be packaged together and
> defined as a function. Besides SELECT queries, the commands can include data
> modifica
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 5774
Logged by: Bala Murugan
Email address: b...@a-cti.com
PostgreSQL version: 8.3.7
Operating system: openSUSE 10.3 (X86-64) - Kernel \r (\l).
Description:VACCUM & REINDEX kills production environement
Details:
Thanks all for your help!!
I am not sure that I'll get all my needed function from built-in UUID. I got
the source from the below link also this works perfectly fine with 8.3
version(in my understanding).
http://ring.nict.go.jp/archives/misc/db/postgresql/projects/gborg/uniqueidentifier/stable/un
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 07:25:52AM +, Bala Murugan wrote:
>
> The following bug has been logged online:
>
> Bug reference: 5774
> Logged by: Bala Murugan
> Email address: b...@a-cti.com
> PostgreSQL version: 8.3.7
> Operating system: openSUSE 10.3 (X86-64) - Kernel \r (\l
Balamurugan Mahendran writes:
> I am not sure that I'll get all my needed function from built-in UUID. I got
> the source from the below link also this works perfectly fine with 8.3
> version(in my understanding).
> http://ring.nict.go.jp/archives/misc/db/postgresql/projects/gborg/uniqueidentifie
Robert Haas writes:
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I believe the definition of "in role" we use here is "has the privileges
>> of role". Since kaiting.chen is a superuser, all privilege tests will
>> succeed for him, including that one. IOW, a superuser is automatically
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas writes:
>> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I believe the definition of "in role" we use here is "has the privileges
>>> of role". Since kaiting.chen is a superuser, all privilege tests will
>>> succeed for him
Hi Kevin,
Thanks for prompt reply.
I will make sure about all you have mentioned here and will let you know
if find any other issue.
Thanks and Regards,
Shafqat
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Grittner [mailto:kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov]
Sent: Saturday, November 27, 2010 1:51 AM
To:
