On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 00:41, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On tor, 2010-09-23 at 08:36 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> I wonder if we want to have a default value for this rather than
>> disabling it when it's not specified by configure. But is there any
>> kind of reasonable default that's not goi
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On tor, 2010-09-23 at 23:56 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
>> > Surely the error message can be polished, though?
>>
>> Well we don't know what errors we might get on unsupported platforms
>> until we test them, and we certainly don't have the re
Dave Page writes:
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On tor, 2010-09-23 at 23:56 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
>>> > Surely the error message can be polished, though?
>
> How else would you suggest we find out what may go wrong on an
> unsupported platform?
My guess here is
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Dimitri Fontaine
wrote:
> Dave Page writes:
>> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> On tor, 2010-09-23 at 23:56 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> Surely the error message can be polished, though?
>>
>> How else would you suggest we find out
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 5675
Logged by: Andreas Pflug
Email address: pgad...@pse-consulting.de
PostgreSQL version: 8.4.4
Operating system: Linux 2.6.26 i686
Description:out of memory at request size 32Mb
Details:
A slony 2.0 cluster
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 8:42 AM, Andreas Pflug
wrote:
>
> The following bug has been logged online:
>
> Bug reference: 5675
> Logged by: Andreas Pflug
> Email address: pgad...@pse-consulting.de
> PostgreSQL version: 8.4.4
> Operating system: Linux 2.6.26 i686
> Description:
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Dave Page wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Samuel Rettore wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm having problems installing the database, see:
>>
>> anfitrite:/opt# ./postgresql-9.0.0-1-linux.bin
>>
>> Error: Error running /tmp/postgresql_installer/getlocales : child
On 9/23/2010 9:53 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
David Schmitt writes:
Executing the attached example.sql on a fresh database demonstrates the
problem I'm seeing:
Found it. If you need a patch right away, it's a one-liner:
diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/path/allpaths.c
b/src/backend/optimizer/pat
Am 24.09.10 14:54, schrieb Robert Haas:
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 8:42 AM, Andreas Pflug
wrote:
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 5675
Logged by: Andreas Pflug
Email address: pgad...@pse-consulting.de
PostgreSQL version: 8.4.4
Operating system: Linux
Hallo Support,
ich habe gestern ein Windows 7 x64 Professional frisch aufgesetzt. Bei
der installation von PostgreSQL tritt dabei am ende der installation ein
Fehler auf.
Fehler:
Problem running post-install step.Installation may not complete correctly.
Error reading file C:/progam Files (x86
On fre, 2010-09-24 at 09:01 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> How else would you suggest we find out what may go wrong on an
> unsupported platform?
Well, some amount of robust and defensive programming can probably
create better error messages in even the most unknown environment.
Especially since the pr
On fre, 2010-09-24 at 11:38 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> I didn't know that existed - thanks. Unfortunately the first box I
> tried it on didn't have it, but that's quite old and not a supported
> platform anyway. if it does exist on everything we support, then that
> could work.
It's tempting, but I
Excerpts from Peter Eisentraut's message of vie sep 24 10:55:58 -0400 2010:
> On fre, 2010-09-24 at 11:38 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> > I didn't know that existed - thanks. Unfortunately the first box I
> > tried it on didn't have it, but that's quite old and not a supported
> > platform anyway. if i
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On fre, 2010-09-24 at 09:01 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
>> How else would you suggest we find out what may go wrong on an
>> unsupported platform?
>
> Well, some amount of robust and defensive programming can probably
> create better error mes
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Alvaro Herrera
wrote:
> Excerpts from Peter Eisentraut's message of vie sep 24 10:55:58 -0400 2010:
>> On fre, 2010-09-24 at 11:38 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
>> > I didn't know that existed - thanks. Unfortunately the first box I
>> > tried it on didn't have it, but t
Excerpts from Alvaro Herrera's message of jue ago 26 17:01:14 -0400 2010:
> Excerpts from Alvaro Herrera's message of jue ago 26 16:46:42 -0400 2010:
> > Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of jue ago 26 16:38:07 -0400 2010:
> > > Those wildcards look a bit scary, although I suppose only a really
> >
On 24/09/2010 8:51 PM, Benito Schlaak wrote:
Hallo Support,
ich habe gestern ein Windows 7 x64 Professional frisch aufgesetzt. Bei
der installation von PostgreSQL tritt dabei am ende der installation ein
Fehler auf.
Fehler:
Problem running post-install step.Installation may not complete correctl
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 4:18 PM, Craig Ringer
wrote:
> On 24/09/2010 8:51 PM, Benito Schlaak wrote:
>>
>> Hallo Support,
>>
>> ich habe gestern ein Windows 7 x64 Professional frisch aufgesetzt. Bei
>> der installation von PostgreSQL tritt dabei am ende der installation ein
>> Fehler auf.
>> Fehler
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 5676
Logged by: Christopher Hotchkiss
Email address: christopher.a.hotchk...@jpmchase.com
PostgreSQL version: 9.0.0
Operating system: Ubuntu 10.04 x64
Description:When creating a trigger an dummy argument is ins
"Christopher Hotchkiss" writes:
> When creating the following trigger:
> CREATE TRIGGER c_aud_trg
> BEFORE INSERT OR UPDATE OR DELETE
> ON ca
> FOR EACH ROW
> EXECUTE PROCEDURE c_aud_trg_trfunc();
> It will actually get created as (using pgAdmin 1.12):
> CREATE TRIGGER c_aud_trg
> BEFO
On fre, 2010-09-24 at 16:10 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> The download page states exactly what distros we consider supported.
Sorry, I was actually looking at the Postgres Plus download page.
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http
Thanks Tom,
I will report it to them.
Christopher A Hotchkiss
JPMorgan Chase & Co. - Navy Cash Application Developer
Email christopher.a.hotchk...@jpmchase.com
-Original Message-
From: Tom Lane [mailto:t...@sss.pgh.pa.us]
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 12:04 PM
To: Christopher A Hotchk
Good afternoon. I am the Chief Architect, with 19 years of experience in the
software industry, for an enterprise software product. I am requesting your
help to better understand or resolve the following issue.
Our architecture is based on Spring and Hibernate. The product is required
to support
stagirus wrote:
> JDBC driver does not convert boolean value (false/true) to
> integers (0/1).
Can you mention which methods of which classes you would expect to
do this?
-Kevin
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www
Thank you for your quick response. As I stated above, we directly do not call
any JDBC API, not any more. It is all done by Hibernate OR mapping. The
above solution (Hibernate mapping) worked fine with Oracle JDBC drivers, for
a long time. I believe Hibernate might be mapping, or calling the
appro
[Moving the discussion to the PostgreSQL JDBC list, with a blind copy
to bugs. This doesn't sound to me like a bug, per se, but an
extension to the JDBC driver which may be a convenience to some
users. We're more likely to get the attention of the right group of
people on the JDBC list.]
stagir
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 5677
Logged by: Andrew Geery
Email address: andrew.ge...@gmail.com
PostgreSQL version: 9.0
Operating system: Ubuntu 10.10
Description:missing libuuid.so.16 library
Details:
In 8.4, the one-click installer for
On 09/25/2010 05:33 AM, stagirus wrote:
> Good afternoon. I am the Chief Architect, with 19 years of experience
> in the software industry
Without meaning to sound excessively grumpy, I'm surprised that those 19
years didn't teach you to provide detailed error messages, in-depth
description, a
>> Now comes the "religious" discussion. The above design works well for
>> Oracle, DB2 and MySQL, etc. But PostgresQL seems to choke. It complains
>> about the data type mismatch. By reading various discussions on your
>> forum,
>> there seems to some issues with the data type mapping at the JDBC
29 matches
Mail list logo
