Re: [BUGS] Bug in PL/pgSQL FOR cursor variant

Excerpts from Heikki Linnakangas's message of lun jun 21 18:29:48 -0400 2010: > On 22/06/10 00:59, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > Excerpts from Heikki Linnakangas's message of lun jun 21 17:47:43 -0400 > > 2010: > > > >> Maybe it would be easier to somehow protect the portal then, and throw > >> an err

Re: [BUGS] pg_upgrade issues

Hi. Ooops, I can't follow your quick thread sorry, It will be a weekend if allowed. Regards, Hiroshi Saito - Original Message - From: "Bruce Momjian" depst...@alliedtesting.com wrote: BB> PostgreSQL 9.0 beta 2 Windows XP Professional SP2 While migrating the database fro

Re: [BUGS] pg_upgrade issues

Hiroshi Saito wrote: > Hi. > > Ooops, I can't follow your quick thread > sorry, It will be a weekend if allowed. I have replied and I think I have it fixed. -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + None of us is g

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5511: Handling of case in Username and database names are inconsistant.

Tom, thanks for the response. It seems to me that whatever jdbc/psql does it needs to do it consistently. The current system appears to be inconsistent and will certainly cause problems for anyone creating/using an new user account via a java application. Our use case is as follows: Person

[BUGS] BUG #5520: PG unable to find java stored procs without input parameters

The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 5520 Logged by: Peter Mengaziol Email address: pmengaz...@electrainfo.com PostgreSQL version: 8.4.4 Operating system: OS X 10.4.13 Description:PG unable to find java stored procs without input parameters Details