[BUGS] BUG #5436: PostGIS 1.5.1 causing postmaster 8.3 crash on index creation

2010-04-23 Thread Nick Bower
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 5436 Logged by: Nick Bower Email address: n...@petangent.net PostgreSQL version: 8.3 + 8.4 Operating system: Windows XP Description:PostGIS 1.5.1 causing postmaster 8.3 crash on index creation Details: Just up

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5436: PostGIS 1.5.1 causing postmaster 8.3 crash on index creation

2010-04-23 Thread Tom Lane
"Nick Bower" writes: > Description:PostGIS 1.5.1 causing postmaster 8.3 crash on index > creation You probably need to report this to the postgis people, not here. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes

[BUGS] BUG #5437: Production db down

2010-04-23 Thread shanmugavel
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 5437 Logged by: shanmugavel Email address: shanmugave...@onwardgroup.com PostgreSQL version: 8.3 Operating system: linux RHEL 5 Description:Production db down Details: Hi, i'm shanmugavel I'm oracle dba now i

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5437: Production db down

2010-04-23 Thread Heikki Linnakangas
shanmugavel wrote: > i'm shanmugavel I'm oracle dba now i handle the postgressql db. now i face > the problem > > how can i resolve that the problem > > > LOG: database system was shut down at 2007-05-14 19:47:51 BST > LOG: invalid magic number 000 in log file 0, segment 0, offset 0 > LOG:

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5437: Production db down

2010-04-23 Thread John R Pierce
shanmugavel wrote: The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 5437 Logged by: shanmugavel Email address: shanmugave...@onwardgroup.com PostgreSQL version: 8.3 Operating system: linux RHEL 5 Description:Production db down Details: Hi, i'm shanmugavel

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5437: Production db down

2010-04-23 Thread Kevin Grittner
"shanmugavel" wrote: > Description:Production db down > now i face the problem > > how can i resolve that the problem > [cut and paste from an archive post from three years ago > about a non-production version under development] You've actually given no information about what prob