Re: [BUGS] bugs that have not been replied-to on list

2010-04-18 Thread Robert Haas
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 7:14 AM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: > Jasen Betts wrote: >> >> On 2010-04-10, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: >>> >>> Craig Ringer wrote: Dave Page wrote: > This basically indicates that we need an issue tracker. There, look - > now see what you made me

Re: [BUGS] bugs that have not been replied-to on list

2010-04-18 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On sön, 2010-04-18 at 13:12 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > That all sounds pretty reasonable to me, though I would favor using > something other than Bugzilla for the tracker. I'm not really sure if > there's anything that I'd consider truly good out there, There isn't. Welcome to the show. ;-)

Re: [BUGS] bugs that have not been replied-to on list

2010-04-18 Thread Greg Sabino Mullane
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 > That all sounds pretty reasonable to me, though I would favor using > something other than Bugzilla for the tracker. I'm not really sure if > there's anything that I'd consider truly good out there, but I've > always found Bugzilla pretty ter

Re: [BUGS] bugs that have not been replied-to on list

2010-04-18 Thread Robert Haas
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote: >> That all sounds pretty reasonable to me, though I would favor using >> something other than Bugzilla for the tracker.  I'm not really sure if >> there's anything that I'd consider truly good out there, but I've >> always found Bugzilla

Re: [BUGS] bugs that have not been replied-to on list

2010-04-18 Thread Jaime Casanova
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Greg Sabino Mullane > wrote: >>> That all sounds pretty reasonable to me, though I would favor using >>> something other than Bugzilla for the tracker.  I'm not really sure if >>> there's anything that I'd con

Re: [BUGS] bugs that have not been replied-to on list

2010-04-18 Thread Tom Lane
Jaime Casanova writes: > On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Robert Haas wrote: >> On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Greg Sabino Mullane >> wrote: >>> Bugzilla is the worst form of bug tracking out there, except for >>> all the others. >> >> One of these days, I am going to write a @$#! bug tracke

Re: [BUGS] bugs that have not been replied-to on list

2010-04-18 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 23:14, Tom Lane wrote: > Jaime Casanova writes: >> On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Robert Haas wrote: >>> On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Greg Sabino Mullane >>> wrote: Bugzilla is the worst form of bug tracking out there, except for all the others. >>> >>>

Re: [BUGS] bugs that have not been replied-to on list

2010-04-18 Thread John R Pierce
Greg Sabino Mullane wrote: Bugzilla is the worst form of bug tracking out there, except for all the others. flyspray isn't half bad, especially because its really simple and fairly clean. supports pgsql too. -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make chang

Re: [BUGS] bugs that have not been replied-to on list

2010-04-18 Thread Robert Haas
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 23:14, Tom Lane wrote: >> Jaime Casanova writes: >>> On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Robert Haas wrote: On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote: > Bugzilla is the worst form of

Re: [BUGS] bugs that have not been replied-to on list

2010-04-18 Thread Jaime Casanova
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 9:03 PM, Robert Haas wrote: [...] > What is frustrating about the current process is that ~5% of the bugs don't > get a response.  How are we going to fix that problem? > that's a two side problem, while certainly there are valid bug reports that fall in the cracks, there