Re: [BUGS] PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required?

2010-03-05 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On tor, 2010-03-04 at 12:09 -0500, Robert Haas wrote: > I think that the whole idea of make targets building different things > depending on what you've built previously is confusing, > counterintuitive, and illogical. make all should either build the > docs, or not; trying to guess what the user

Re: [BUGS] PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required?

2010-03-05 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On tor, 2010-03-04 at 17:53 +, Lou Picciano wrote: > While I'd agree a 'make all' should, uh... make _all_, and that make > building based on lots of guessing is counterintuitive, an option to > configure like: > > ./configure --no-docs or ./configure --with-htmldocs-only > > - with som

Re: [BUGS] PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required?

2010-03-05 Thread Tom Lane
Peter Eisentraut writes: > On tor, 2010-03-04 at 17:53 +, Lou Picciano wrote: >> ./configure --no-docs or ./configure --with-htmldocs-only > But that would be a negative regression for end users, who we want to > have the docs available by default, so they can read them. "End users" in th

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5348: Postgres crashes with index on xpath_string

2010-03-05 Thread Thomas Kellerer
Thanks for the feedback. Is the problem specific to 8.4.2 or to the Windows platform (or both)? Regards Thomas Bruce Momjian, 27.02.2010 18:42: Yes, we have received a few reports about this and are working on a fix. --

[BUGS] BUG #5364: citext behavior when type not in public schema

2010-03-05 Thread Markus Wichitill
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 5364 Logged by: Markus Wichitill Email address: ma...@gmx.de PostgreSQL version: 8.4.2 Operating system: Linux, Win7 Description:citext behavior when type not in public schema Details: Comparisons with columns

Re: [BUGS] PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required?

2010-03-05 Thread Lou Picciano
Tom's suggestion is much better than mine. I concur fully. My issue, essentially, is that I want to get on with the business of actually testing these alphas... The 'Jade effect' has become an obstacle; time wasted. And, though I do want the documentation - ultimately - I'd like the optio

Re: [BUGS] PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required?

2010-03-05 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On fre, 2010-03-05 at 08:09 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut writes: > > On tor, 2010-03-04 at 17:53 +, Lou Picciano wrote: > >> ./configure --no-docs or ./configure --with-htmldocs-only > > > But that would be a negative regression for end users, who we want to > > have the docs

Re: [BUGS] PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required?

2010-03-05 Thread Robert Haas
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 8:09 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut writes: >> On tor, 2010-03-04 at 17:53 +, Lou Picciano wrote: >>> ./configure --no-docs   or ./configure --with-htmldocs-only > >> But that would be a negative regression for end users, who we want to >> have the docs availabl

Re: [BUGS] PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required?

2010-03-05 Thread Robert Haas
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > By splitting out the doc building into a separate target, we will have > less users installing the documentation. I don't see why. And even if it's true, it just means some people were installing the docs "by accident" before even though

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5348: Postgres crashes with index on xpath_string

2010-03-05 Thread Robert Haas
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 3:52 AM, Thomas Kellerer wrote: > Thanks for the feedback. > > Is the problem specific to 8.4.2 or to the Windows platform (or both)? Neither, actually. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http:/

Re: [BUGS] Bug in triggers

2010-03-05 Thread Robert Haas
2010/3/3 Oleg Serov : > I'm asking to fix this =) > > On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 9:53 PM, Robert Haas wrote: >> It does seem weird that assigning NEW to var changes the value; I'm >> not sure why that happens.  Is that what you're asking about? Anyone else have an opinion on whether this is a bug? .

Re: [BUGS] Bug in triggers

2010-03-05 Thread Tom Lane
Robert Haas writes: >> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 9:53 PM, Robert Haas wrote: >> It does seem weird that assigning NEW to var changes the value; I'm >> not sure why that happens.  Is that what you're asking about? > Anyone else have an opinion on whether this is a bug? It's arguably a bug, but sinc

Re: [BUGS] Bug in triggers

2010-03-05 Thread Chris Travers
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Haas writes: >>> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 9:53 PM, Robert Haas wrote: >>> It does seem weird that assigning NEW to var changes the value; I'm >>> not sure why that happens.  Is that what you're asking about? > >> Anyone else have an opinion

Re: [BUGS] Bug in triggers

2010-03-05 Thread Robert Haas
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Haas writes: >>> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 9:53 PM, Robert Haas wrote: >>> It does seem weird that assigning NEW to var changes the value; I'm >>> not sure why that happens.  Is that what you're asking about? > >> Anyone else have an opinion