Re: [BUGS] BUG #5063: MS Access crashes by quiting after linking tables with PostgreSQL

2009-09-22 Thread Annita Veneti
Matt you are absolutely right! The msysconf is not related... Yesterday I did some test and have seen that the access is working fine with postgres as long as the SSL mode is disable, as soon as I put it enabled then it crashes on shutdown Go figure!!! Any ideas? Annita -Ursprüngliche

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5066: plperl issues with perl_destruct() and END blocks

2009-09-22 Thread Tim Bunce
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 07:30:51PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > David Fetter writes: > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 12:06:30PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > >>> With connection poolers, backends can last quite awhile. Is it OK > >>> for the END block to run hours after the rest of the code? Yes. > >>

[BUGS] BUG #5072: User trying to drop an internally dependent object crashes server

2009-09-22 Thread Amit Khandekar
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 5072 Logged by: Amit Khandekar Email address: amit.khande...@enterprisedb.com PostgreSQL version: 8.5devel Operating system: All Description:User trying to drop an internally dependent object crashes server Deta

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5066: plperl issues with perl_destruct() and END blocks

2009-09-22 Thread Robert Haas
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > David Fetter writes: >> On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 12:06:30PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: With connection poolers, backends can last quite awhile.  Is it OK for the END block to run hours after the rest of the code? >>> >>> This is an int

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5066: plperl issues with perl_destruct() and END blocks

2009-09-22 Thread Tom Lane
Robert Haas writes: > If the changes are simple, as Tim seems to believe, exactly what do we > lose by doing this? It's not simple. There are any number of issues that Tim has not addressed. The most obvious: *his* use case might not require database access in an END block, but that doesn't mea

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5066: plperl issues with perl_destruct() and END blocks

2009-09-22 Thread Robert Haas
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 10:13 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Haas writes: >> If the changes are simple, as Tim seems to believe, exactly what do we >> lose by doing this? > > It's not simple.  There are any number of issues that Tim has not > addressed.  The most obvious: *his* use case might not r

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5063: MS Access crashes by quiting after linking tables with PostgreSQL

2009-09-22 Thread Matt Taylor
No. You probably need someone more knowledgeable than myself! Now that you have narrowed down the problem, someone should be able to help. You will need to provide more details about your system. i.e. operating system, PostgreSQL server version, driver version (I assume ODBC), and MS Access

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5072: User trying to drop an internally dependent object crashes server

2009-09-22 Thread Tom Lane
"Amit Khandekar" writes: > If a DROP command is issued for an object that is actually a part of > internal implementation of another object, then the command crashes the > server. How embarrassing --- evidently that specific code path never got tested. Fixed, thanks for the report!

Re: [BUGS] Problem installing Postgres 8.4.1

2009-09-22 Thread Robert Haas
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Christine Penner wrote: > At 11:57 AM 21/09/2009, you wrote: >> >> What error you get when you run initdb?? (Also what exact command you >> run?) > > The first time I just double clicked on the file initdb.exe. Just now I > tried to run it through the command promp

[BUGS] Requesting the Revision History

2009-09-22 Thread nanda gopal
Dear sir,I am Nandagopal graduating M.E (Software Engg.,) in Anna University in INDIA.I am doing my final year project regarding software changes (using change classification technique)of open source projects.It will be helpfull to me if you send me the revision history of PostgreSQL.So please kind

Re: [BUGS] Requesting the Revision History

2009-09-22 Thread Euler Taveira de Oliveira
nanda gopal escreveu: > projects.It will be helpfull to me if you send me the revision history > of PostgreSQL.So please kindly send me the revision history(consisting > of features changed). > This is not a bug. Please don't post unrelated topics here. You can rsync our anonymous repository. rs