Tom Lane wrote:
Hm, the "Assert(rte->subquery != NULL)" doesn't seem right ...
couldn't there be non-RTE_SUBQUERY rtes in the child? I think the
original coding was guaranteed to visit only subquery-type RTEs
but I'm much less convinced about this one. It might
be better to say
if (rte-
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 4352
Logged by: Bhaskar Sirohi
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: 8.3
Operating system: Windows 2003 Server
Description:Service fails to start when moved from domain to
workgroup
Details:
It
"Heikki Linnakangas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Hm, the "Assert(rte->subquery != NULL)" doesn't seem right ...
>> couldn't there be non-RTE_SUBQUERY rtes in the child?
> Oh, indeed it's not okay. The original UNION ALL view is a prime example
> of that. I didn't notice becau
