The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 4243
Logged by: Clemens Wagner
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: 8.2.7 and 8.3.1
Operating system: Linux 2.6.18-53.1.14.el5
Description:Idle in transaction
Details:
I have sometimes hanging
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 5:21 AM, Hiroshi Saito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Sorry, late the information.
> My patch was applied after the review of Ralf-san. However, The timing of a
> release was different. Then, patch is only current CVS-HEAD.
> http://cvs.ossp.org/chngview?cn=6001
>
Hi.
Um, I will arrange information and write wiki. .
Is it a suitable place?
This is some information.
http://winpg.jp/~saito/pg_work/OSSP_win32/
uuid-ossp.dll(MinGW compile) is this.
http://winpg.jp/~saito/pg_work/OSSP_win32/pg8.3.3-win-bin-uuid-ossp.zip
Regards,
Hiroshi Saito
- Origi
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 10:25 AM, Hiroshi Saito
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Um, I will arrange information and write wiki. . Is it a suitable place?
A README file at http://winpg.jp/~saito/pg_work/OSSP_win32/ would be enough.
> This is some information. http://winpg.jp/~saito/pg_work/OSS
Hi.
Please this.
http://winpg.jp/~saito/pg_work/OSSP_win32/msvc/
P.S)
sorry,
It did not have a machine, when it mailed with you before.
Regards,
Hiroshi Saito
- Original Message -
From: "Dave Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 10:25 AM, Hiroshi Saito
<[EMAIL PROTE
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 11:17 AM, Hiroshi Saito
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Please this.
> http://winpg.jp/~saito/pg_work/OSSP_win32/msvc/
Ahh, a makefile - that makes things somewhat clearer :-)
Thanks - I've updated the build machine so future releases will
include this fix.
--
Dave
Using the dll from the link that Hiroshi posted actually fixed v1 in my
case (though perhaps it's just an unrelated side-effect caused by using
a different random number generator which might be slower???). Thanks!
Anyhow, I would have expected v1 to work fine in this case too as the
ossp-uui
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 4244
Logged by: Tatsuhito Kasahara
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: 8.3.3
Operating system: RedHat Linux 5.2
Description:ALTER TABLE ... NO INHERIT problem
Details:
Hi.
I performed "NO INH
"Tatsuhito Kasahara" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The comment in tablecmds.c says "AccessShareLock is probably enough".
> But it actually needs more strong lock mode ?
> ATExecDropInherit(Relation rel, RangeVar *parent)
> /*
>* AccessShareLock on the parent is probably enough, seein
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 06:49:57AM +, Clemens Wagner wrote:
> I have sometimes hanging psql backend processes with "idle in transaction"
There is no bug here. Some transaction is stuck waiting for something
else, or else you've left a transaction hanging around that way (is
your JDBC driver o
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 4245
Logged by: Kevin
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: 8.0
Operating system: Windows
Description:Product Name...
Details:
Last week I placed a new product in the catalog. By mistake I named
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Kevin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The following bug has been logged online:
>
> Bug reference: 4245
> Logged by: Kevin
> Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> PostgreSQL version: 8.0
> Operating system: Windows
> Description:Product Name
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 4247
Logged by: J6M
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: 8.1.13
Operating system: Linux x86-64
Description:(Possible) SQL miscontruct not flagged
Details:
Hi,
This European afternoon, I was tr
"J6M" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> PostgreSQL version: 8.1.13
> I wrote :
> select distinct(ean13),(select count(*) into zz from fiart where
> ean13=a.ean13) as n from fiart as a ;
> I am not an expert in the most intricate shades of the SQL language. Should
> the SQL interpreter not flag the q
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 4250
Logged by: Wojciech Tylek
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: 8.1,8.2,8.3
Operating system: Linux
Description:subquery in query
Details:
There are two example tables:
create table a (
>>> "Wojciech Tylek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why the query like:
>
> select * from b where a_id in (select a_id from a where b_id in
(10,20));
>
> does not return error?
> The table "a" does not have b_id!
This is a correlated subquery. A previous list post on the topic:
http://arch
16 matches
Mail list logo