[BUGS] Win32: Postgre 8.3.1 does not work with Active perl 5.10

2008-05-19 Thread Eugen.Konkov
a.. 1. Install Active perl 5.8a.. 2. Install PostgreSQL 8.3.1a.. 3. CREATE plperl FUNCTION a.. 4. Call this FUNCTION TO CHECK that plperl.dll IS loaded AND FUNCTION executeda.. 5. Deinstall Active perl 5.8a.. 6. Install Active perl 5.10a.. 7. When you call plperl FUNCTION you get next error:a..

Re: [BUGS] Win32: Postgre 8.3.1 does not work with Active perl 5.10

2008-05-19 Thread Dave Page
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 6:18 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1. Install Active perl 5.8 > 2. Install PostgreSQL 8.3.1 > 3. CREATE plperl FUNCTION > 4. Call this FUNCTION TO CHECK that plperl.dll IS loaded AND FUNCTION > executed > 5. Deinstall Active perl 5.8 > 6. Install Active perl 5.10 > 7. Wh

[BUGS] apr integration

2008-05-19 Thread Bob Rossi
Hi, Apr allows the use of the wonderful postgresql db. It has an autotools test that checks to see if it can link against -lpq. However, checking against just -lpq is not always enough. On linux, sometimes you need '-lpq -lcrypt'. On windows, sometimes you need '-lpq -lSecur32 -lws_32'. So, my qu

Re: [BUGS] apr integration

2008-05-19 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Am Montag, 19. Mai 2008 schrieb Bob Rossi: > Apr allows the use of the wonderful postgresql db. It has an autotools > test that checks to see if it can link against -lpq. However, checking > against just -lpq is not always enough. On linux, sometimes you need > '-lpq -lcrypt'. On windows, sometimes

Re: [BUGS] apr integration

2008-05-19 Thread Bob Rossi
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 12:01:32AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Am Montag, 19. Mai 2008 schrieb Bob Rossi: > > Apr allows the use of the wonderful postgresql db. It has an autotools > > test that checks to see if it can link against -lpq. However, checking > > against just -lpq is not always en

Re: [BUGS] apr integration

2008-05-19 Thread Tom Lane
Bob Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 12:01:32AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> I don't know about Windows, but on Linux -lpq should always be enough >> (unless >> you are linking statically). Everything else would seem to be a bug. > Yup, linking statically. Do yo

Re: [BUGS] apr integration

2008-05-19 Thread Bob Rossi
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 08:30:46PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Bob Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 12:01:32AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > >> I don't know about Windows, but on Linux -lpq should always be enough > >> (unless > >> you are linking statically). Everyt

Re: [BUGS] apr integration

2008-05-19 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Am Dienstag, 20. Mai 2008 schrieb Bob Rossi: > On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 12:01:32AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > Am Montag, 19. Mai 2008 schrieb Bob Rossi: > > > Apr allows the use of the wonderful postgresql db. It has an autotools > > > test that checks to see if it can link against -lpq. How