The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 4096
Logged by:
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: 8.3.1
Operating system: Linux
Description:PG 8.3.1. confused about remaining disk space
Details:
I ran today a legacy application with PG 8
[EMAIL PROTECTED] napsal(a):
I ran today a legacy application with PG 8.3.1 on a test machine.
The DB is some ~30 MB. Default tables do have OIDs and BLCKSZ is set
system-wide to 16384 (because of another DB).
Can you tried your application with standard BLKSZ? Or Can you send testcase?
A
"Zdenek Kotala" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] napsal(a):
>> relation 1663/19693/634162: No space left on device
...
>> Disk saturation, you think ? No at all, as in the meantime :
>>
>> FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
>> /dev/sda3 9.9G 8.5G 87
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 4097
Logged by: Adriaan van Kekem
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: 8.1
Operating system: Ubuntu 7.04
Description:can join + where query be optimized?
Details:
In the following query you see
- Original Message -
From: "Zdenek Kotala" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 12:51 PM
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #4096: PG 8.3.1. confused about remaining disk space
[EMAIL PROTECTED] napsal(a):
I ran today a legacy application with PG 8.3.1
- Original Message -
From: "Gregory Stark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Zdenek Kotala" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 1:14 PM
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #4096: PG 8.3.1. confused about remaining disk space
Also check "df -i"
This might be an
"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A lot of messages like these do appear wich tend to indicate PG 8.3.1 is
> confused. This set of SQL scripts used to run from PG 7.0.3 to PG 8.2.6 with
> no problem.
> WARNING: could not create relation-cache initialization file
> "base/19693/pg_internal.init.293
OK. So why did this not occur when I was running 8.2.6 ?
To avoid any ambiguity, here we go
estp-intranet:~ # su - postgres
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> cd /var/lib/pgsql
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> cd data
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/data> ls
base pg_hba.confpg_multixact pg_twophase postgresql.conf
global
Linux estp-intranet 2.6.22.5-31-default #1 SMP 2007/09/21 22:29:00 UTC i686
i686 i386 GNU/Linux
How can I precisely answer to the reiserfs version question ?
(Although I presume the 2005 fix mentioned in the link you provided has been
applied, as OpenSuSE 10.3 was published on the 4th of Octob
debugreiserfs /dev/sdb1
debugreiserfs 3.6.19 (2003 www.namesys.com)
Filesystem state: consistency is not checked after last mounting
Reiserfs super block in block 16 on 0x811 of format 3.6 with standard
journal
Count of blocks on the device: 9769520
Number of bitmaps: 299
Blocksize: 4096
Free
Sorry, this is the URL I meant to send:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg19905.html
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Ask me about EnterpriseDB's RemoteDBA services!
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make
What version of linux and reiserfs?
see also:
http://osdir.com/ml/file-systems.reiserfs.general/2004-01/msg00116.html
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Ask me about EnterpriseDB's 24x7 Postgres support!
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@p
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 4098
Logged by: Jan-Peter Seifert
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: 8.2
Operating system: Windows xp
Description:Encoding problems
Details:
The encoding of the source db/server is LATIN1. Th
Jan-Peter Seifert wrote:
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 4098
Logged by: Jan-Peter Seifert
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: 8.2
Operating system: Windows xp
Description:Encoding problems
Details:
The encoding of the sou
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 4099
Logged by: felipe macedo
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: 8.2
Operating system: windows 2003 server
Description:backup error
Details:
This is urgent, I would like to know if there is a
J6M wrote:
OK. So why did this not occur when I was running 8.2.6 ?
I would advise to install some very detailed monitoring on your
diskspace usage and look for spikes that correlate with your database
errors -. I have seen this issue with bad queries that are resulting in
enormous on-disk
16 matches
Mail list logo