[BUGS] BUG #3819: UTF8 can't handle \000

2007-12-17 Thread Franklin Schmidt
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 3819 Logged by: Franklin Schmidt Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PostgreSQL version: 8.2 Operating system: XP & Linux Description:UTF8 can't handle \000 Details: Trying to store \000 in a text field with UTF8

[BUGS] BUG #3820: auto-installer-failed

2007-12-17 Thread Sergey
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 3820 Logged by: Sergey Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PostgreSQL version: 8.3.beta4 Operating system: Windows Vista x64 Description:auto-installer-failed Details: I have 8.2 version work and running, also I

Re: [BUGS] BUG #3819: UTF8 can't handle \000

2007-12-17 Thread Bruce Momjian
Franklin Schmidt wrote: > > The following bug has been logged online: > > Bug reference: 3819 > Logged by: Franklin Schmidt > Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > PostgreSQL version: 8.2 > Operating system: XP & Linux > Description:UTF8 can't handle \000 > Details: >

Re: [BUGS] BUG #3819: UTF8 can't handle \000

2007-12-17 Thread Bruce Momjian
Franklin Schmidt wrote: > On Dec 17, 2007 12:54 AM, Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Uh, as far as I know 0x00 is not a valid UTF8 byte value. > > > I think it is a valid value. RFC 3629 says: > > "Character numbers from U+ to U+007F (US-ASCII repertoire) > correspond to oct

Re: [BUGS] BUG #3819: UTF8 can't handle \000

2007-12-17 Thread Franklin Schmidt
On Dec 17, 2007 12:54 AM, Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Uh, as far as I know 0x00 is not a valid UTF8 byte value. I think it is a valid value. RFC 3629 says: "Character numbers from U+ to U+007F (US-ASCII repertoire) correspond to octets 00 to 7F (7 bit US-ASCII values)." ht

Re: [BUGS] BUG #3819: UTF8 can't handle \000

2007-12-17 Thread Franklin Schmidt
On Dec 17, 2007 1:28 AM, Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Well, I realize 0x00 is a valid ASCII value and therefore a valid UTF8 > value but we have never had anyone complain they can't store the 0x00 > character because it doesn't mean anything in ASCII. They use bytea to > store bina

[BUGS] BUG #3821: Wrong language at "Installation Notes"

2007-12-17 Thread Ronny Hellgren
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 3821 Logged by: Ronny Hellgren Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PostgreSQL version: 8.2 Operating system: Windows XP Description:Wrong language at "Installation Notes" Details: When I am trying to install Post

Re: [BUGS] BUG #3819: UTF8 can't handle \000

2007-12-17 Thread Heikki Linnakangas
Franklin Schmidt wrote: I agree that storing 0x00 in a UTF8 string is weird, but I am converting a huge database to postgres, and in a huge database, weird things happen. Using bytea for a text field just because one in a million records has a 0x00 doesn't make sense to me. I did hack around it

[BUGS] bug found in 8.3 beta 3.

2007-12-17 Thread chris wood
Hi, I found this bug? In beta 3. I am not a Linux guru so installing any betas in Debian is very painful for me. Perhaps you could check to see if it is still there in beta 4?? Last time I reported a bug http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2007-11/msg00584.php I did not get any d

Re: [BUGS] bug found in 8.3 beta 3.

2007-12-17 Thread Tom Lane
"chris wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, I found this bug? In beta 3. I am not a Linux guru so installing any > betas in Debian is very painful for me. Perhaps you could check to see if > it is still there in beta 4?? I see no bug here. You're invoking a set-returning function from a PERF

[BUGS] BUG #3822: Nonstandard precedence for comparison operators

2007-12-17 Thread Pedro Gimeno
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 3822 Logged by: Pedro Gimeno Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PostgreSQL version: 8.2.5 Operating system: Any Description:Nonstandard precedence for comparison operators Details: The operators <>, <= and >= ar

Re: [BUGS] bug found in 8.3 beta 3.

2007-12-17 Thread Dimitri Fontaine
Hi, Le Monday 17 December 2007 19:05:36 chris wood, vous avez écrit : > Hi, I found this bug? In beta 3. I am not a Linux guru so installing any > betas in Debian is very painful for me. Perhaps you could check to see if > it is still there in beta 4?? The experimental sources of debian already