The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 3811
Logged by: Adriaan van Os
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: 8.2.5
Operating system: Mac OS X 10.5
Description:Getting multiple values from a sequence generator
Details:
The following ha
Hi,
Simon Arlott [2007-12-08 12:24 +]:
> Bug reference: 3809
> Logged by: Simon Arlott
> Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> PostgreSQL version: 8.2.4
> Operating system: Linux 2.6.23
> Description:SSL "unsafe" private key permissions bug
> Details:
>
> FATAL: un
On Sun, 2007-12-09 at 09:24 +, Adriaan van Os wrote:
> The following bug has been logged online:
>
> Bug reference: 3811
> Logged by: Adriaan van Os
> Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> PostgreSQL version: 8.2.5
> Operating system: Mac OS X 10.5
> Description:Getti
On Dec 9, 2007, at 9:24 , Adriaan van Os wrote:
1. LOCK TABLE doesn't work on a sequence
2. nextval will happily ignore ISOLATION LEVEL SERIALIZABLE of
concurrent
transactions
Nor should it. Sequences are *by design* non-lockable and non-blocking.
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs.FAQ
"Michael Glaesemann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Dec 9, 2007, at 9:24 , Adriaan van Os wrote:
>
>> 3. nextval doesn't have an optional "increase" parameter (the increase is
>> always one).
>
> Not true. Please read the documentation at
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/static/sql-create
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> OK, works for me. I'll try to look at it after I have attended to the
> Windows build issues. My plate is pretty full right now, though.
FYI I'm having a look at it now.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.amazon.com/gp/registry/CTMLCN8V17R4
"Llegará una época
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
OK, works for me. I'll try to look at it after I have attended to the
Windows build issues. My plate is pretty full right now, though.
FYI I'm having a look at it now.
Great. Thanks.
cheers
andrew
---(end o
