The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 3318
Logged by: chee leong
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: 8.1.4
Operating system: Windows XP
Description:PostgreSQL : server process (PID 3480) was terminated by
signal 5
Details:
Dear Si
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 3319
Logged by: Pedro Gimeno
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: 8.2.4
Operating system: Linux
Description:Superuser can't revoke grants on a schema given by
aother user
Details:
When a USAGE
I
would
like
to
leave
the
list
...
--
Acelerador POP
Acelere a sua conexão discada em até 19 x. Use o Acelerador POP. É grátis, pegue já o seu.
http://www.pop.com.br/acelerador
Marcos Fabrício Corso wrote:
I would like to leave the list ...
Not really a question worth posting several lists. If you don't know how
to unsubscribe, try starting with the form linked from here.
http://www.postgresql.org/community/lists/
--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd
--
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 3320
Logged by: Jan Szumiec
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: 8.2.4
Operating system: Windows XP
Description:Error when using INSERT...RETURNING as a subquery
Details:
Having:
CREATE TABLE
"Pedro Gimeno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> When a USAGE grant on a SCHEMA is given by an user (non-superuser in my
> case), the superuser can't revoke it; instead the REVOKE statement is
> silently ignored.
This is not a bug. If you want to revoke the privilege, revoke the
GRANT OPTION you orig
"Jan Szumiec" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> UPDATE items SET (type, post_id) = (INSERT INTO efforts (effort) VALUES
> (667) RETURNING 'Item', id) WHERE id = 1937
Sorry, RETURNING is only supported at the top level of a query.
regards, tom lane
---(
What is signal 5 in XP? I looked in the MinGW source used to build
PostgreSQL 8.1.4 and there is no mention of a signal 5 there. I see
signal 5 mentioned here:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2004-11/msg00175.php
and it was diagnosed as an invalid memory access.
I suggest yo
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> What is signal 5 in XP? I looked in the MinGW source used to build
> PostgreSQL 8.1.4 and there is no mention of a signal 5 there. I see
> signal 5 mentioned here:
Access denied. Most often showed for accessing memory outside the mapped
space, so this similar to SIGSEGV.
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 09:41:38AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Jan Szumiec" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > UPDATE items SET (type, post_id) = (INSERT INTO efforts (effort) VALUES
> > (667) RETURNING 'Item', id) WHERE id = 1937
>
> Sorry, RETURNING is only supported at the top level of a query.
Wha
"David Fetter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 09:41:38AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> "Jan Szumiec" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > UPDATE items SET (type, post_id) = (INSERT INTO efforts (effort) VALUES
>> > (667) RETURNING 'Item', id) WHERE id = 1937
>>
>> Sorry, RETURNING
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 3321
Logged by: Alceu Paz
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: 7.4
Operating system: Windows XP
Description:No start service
Details:
When the service of postgres initiates windows Xp this mark
On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 18:10 +0100, Gregory Stark wrote:
> It has the same problem that SELECT triggers have. How many rows should you
> expect that subquery to insert, update, or delete if it's used in a join
> clause? Or in the where clause of another insert/update/delete statement?
>
We could h
Jeff Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 18:10 +0100, Gregory Stark wrote:
>> It has the same problem that SELECT triggers have. How many rows should you
>> expect that subquery to insert, update, or delete if it's used in a join
>> clause? Or in the where clause of another in
14 matches
Mail list logo
