Re: [BUGS] BUG #3242: FATAL: could not unlock semaphore: error code 298

2007-04-22 Thread Magnus Hagander
Marcin Waldowski wrote: > Magnus Hagander wrote: >> Tom Lane wrote: >> >>> Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> No, it's definitly the right primitive. But we're creating it with a max count of 1. >>> That's definitely wrong. There are at least three rea

Re: [BUGS] BUG #3245: PANIC: failed to re-find shared loc k ob ject

2007-04-22 Thread Heikki Linnakangas
Tom Lane wrote: "Dorochevsky,Michel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: The failing transaction is visible in the database after restart, I have checked three of the last inserts, e.g. Good, at least we're not losing data ;-). But I expected that because this PANIC must be occurring after the Record

Re: [BUGS] BUG #3245: PANIC: failed to re-find shared loc k ob ject

2007-04-22 Thread Dave Page
Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > I think we need to see more debug-information. Is there a debug- and > assertion-enabled binary available for Windows? Unfortunately no - 95% of the time we've found that Mingw/gdb on windows simply doesn't work. That's one of the major reasons why we're working on movi

Re: [BUGS] BUG #3245: PANIC: failed to re-find shared loc k ob ject

2007-04-22 Thread Tom Lane
Dave Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Heikki Linnakangas wrote: >> I think we need to see more debug-information. Is there a debug- and >> assertion-enabled binary available for Windows? > Unfortunately no - 95% of the time we've found that Mingw/gdb on windows > simply doesn't work. That's one

Re: [BUGS] BUG #3245: PANIC: failed to re-find shared loc k ob ject

2007-04-22 Thread Heikki Linnakangas
Dave Page wrote: Heikki Linnakangas wrote: I think we need to see more debug-information. Is there a debug- and assertion-enabled binary available for Windows? Unfortunately no - 95% of the time we've found that Mingw/gdb on windows simply doesn't work. That's one of the major reasons why we'r

Re: [BUGS] BUG #3245: PANIC: failed to re-find shared loc k ob ject

2007-04-22 Thread Dave Page
Heikki Linnakangas wrote: I can build one tomorrow if you want to try for the 5%. What version was this? Thanks, it was 8.2.3. Actually, no reason this needs to wait until I'm in the office. Michel; I've uploaded an 8.2.3 postgres.exe to http://developer.pgadmin.org/~dpage/postgres-8.2.3-de

Re: [BUGS] BUG #3244: problem with PREPARE

2007-04-22 Thread Tom Lane
"William Lawrance" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This program that does "PQprepare" and then > "PQexecPrepared" has worked previously, but doesn't > work now. > ... > strcpy(openStmt, "declare C1 cursor for select cola" >" from tprep" >" where