[BUGS] BUG #2830: Wrong results for prepared statements while clustering target table

2006-12-16 Thread
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 2830 Logged by: Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PostgreSQL version: 8.2.0, older Operating system: Ubuntu 6.10 2.6.17-10-386, libc6 2.4-1ubuntu12 Description:Wrong results for prepared statements while cluster

[BUGS] lost on referentail integrity

2006-12-16 Thread Patrice Beliveau
Hi, I'm using PostgreSQL 8.1.4 The problem is very simple to reproduce: create table test1 ( pk1 text not null, df1 text, primary key(pk1) ); create table test2 ( pk1 text not null, pk2 text not null, df2 text, primary key(pk1,pk2) ); alter table test2 add constraint c1 foreign

[BUGS] BUG #2829: Runaway logs - "SSL SYSCALL error"

2006-12-16 Thread Sean
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 2829 Logged by: Sean Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PostgreSQL version: 8.2 Operating system: W2K Server Description:Runaway logs - "SSL SYSCALL error" Details: A couple of times in the last month or two (fi

Re: [BUGS] lost on referentail integrity

2006-12-16 Thread Tom Lane
Patrice Beliveau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The problem is very simple to reproduce: [ shrug... ] Your trigger suppressed the cascaded deletes. What were you expecting to happen? regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)-

Re: [BUGS] BUG #2830: Wrong results for prepared statements while clustering target table

2006-12-16 Thread Tom Lane
"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Prepared SELECT/UPDATE/DELETE statements produce wrong results if executed > while target table is being clustered. The short answer is "don't CLUSTER while the table is in live use" ... CLUSTER re-inserts all the rows in the table into a fresh table. This means

Re: [BUGS] BUG #2829: Runaway logs - "SSL SYSCALL error"

2006-12-16 Thread Tom Lane
"Sean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The pg log files are the culprit - they fill up at a rate of about 50 megs a > minute with lines reading > "SSL SYSCALL error: A blocking operation was interrupted by a call to > WSACancelBlockingCall." We've seen this reported before... > Is this a psql probl