Andreas,
I had another opportunity to do a restore for a client today. Both restore
attempts that I'll be describing were to a remote Mac OS X machine with
PostgreSQL 8.0.7 installed.
Knowing that it wasn't going to work using PGAdmin III, I went directly to a
command window on the machine with P
The error messages refer to the old relfilenode (in 3 out of 3
occurrences today).
Pete
>>> Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 04/14/06 2:41 am >>>
OK ... but what's still unclear is whether the failures are occurring
against the old relfilenode (the one just removed by the CLUSTER) or
the
new one just
Hi all,
In the last couple of days, we've been bitten (a couple of times, on
different servers) by an apparent glitch or bad interaction in the
Windows implementation of rename().
The relevant log message is:
[2006-04-17 16:49:22.583 ] 2252 LOG: could not rename file
"pg_xlog/0001010A00
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 2399
Logged by: Alvaro
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: 8.1.3-1
Operating system: Windows
Description:Postgis DLL corrupted
Details:
Hello, I'm from Argentina.
I've downloaded twice from di
Boa Tarde !! Numa aplicação, de acordo com o btnbotton clicado, a variável opçao receberá um valor. No decorrer do processo, de acordo com a opcao deverá executar um comando da function onde os valores a serem adicionados (input) serão supridos na aplicação.Só que dá o seguinte erro:ERROR:
I have looked at this behavior, which indeed is new for 8.1. The change
was caused by code I think I did to improve the behavior of
log_statement, specifically streamlining how we check for the type of
command.
In looking at reverting to the 8.0 behavior of logging error commands
with 'all', I s
Peter Brant wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> In the last couple of days, we've been bitten (a couple of times, on
> different servers) by an apparent glitch or bad interaction in the
> Windows implementation of rename().
>
> The relevant log message is:
>
> [2006-04-17 16:49:22.583 ] 2252 LOG: could not re
""Peter Brant"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> In the last couple of days, we've been bitten (a couple of times, on
> different servers) by an apparent glitch or bad interaction in the
> Windows implementation of rename().
>
> The relevant log message is:
>
> [2006-04-17 16:49:22.583 ] 2252 LOG: could n
Roberto Castro wrote:
Numa aplicação, de acordo com o btnbotton clicado, a variável ‘opçao’
receberá um valor. No decorrer do processo, de acordo com a ‘opcao’
deverá executar um comando da function onde os valores a serem
adicionados (input) serão supridos na aplicação.
Envie somente *bugs*
