[BUGS] BUG #2246: Bad malloc interactions: ecpg, openssl

2006-02-08 Thread Andy Klosterman
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 2246 Logged by: Andy Klosterman Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PostgreSQL version: 8.1.0 Operating system: Debian testing: Linux nc3 2.4.27-2-386 #1 Wed Nov 30 21:38:51 JST 2005 i686 GNU/Linux Description:Bad

Re: [BUGS] BUG #2246: Bad malloc interactions: ecpg, openssl

2006-02-08 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Andy Klosterman wrote: > Before going into a full description and figuring out some example code for > this situation, I'm fishing for interesting in tracking it down and fixing > it (or not). Whenever there is a bug that causes a crash, there is interest in tracking it down and fixing it. Pleas

Re: [BUGS] BUG #2243: Postgresql fails to finish some queries

2006-02-08 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 02:41:03 +, Matej Rizman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Files a_3.txt and b_3.txt contain 3 numbers each. > > The last query (SELECT) is executed on my machine in 125ms. > > If I load data from files a_10.txt and b_10.txt that contain 10 > n

Re: [BUGS] BUG #2236: extremely slow to get unescaped bytea data

2006-02-08 Thread Michael Fuhr
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 09:52:33AM -0800, Kalador Tech Support wrote: > $tfetch = microtime(true); > > // Convert to binary and send to the browser > // header('Content-type: image/gif'); > header('Content-type: text/plain'); > $data = pg_unescape_bytea($raw); > $dt = microtime(true) - $tfetch; T

Re: [BUGS] BUG #2246: Bad malloc interactions: ecpg, openssl

2006-02-08 Thread Tom Lane
"Andy Klosterman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > SPECULATION: Another possibility is that I misunderstand some aspect of > multi-threaded interactions with Postgres (I open uniquely named connections > to the DB for each thread of my test program). Maybe I need to have a > "lock" around the code th

Re: [PATCHES] [BUGS] date overflows

2006-02-08 Thread Tom Lane
Kris Jurka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 07:53:23PM -0500, Kris Jurka wrote: >>> I'm seeing some date input overflows here. > This seems to fix it. Applied as far back as 8.0 (a rather arbitrary cutoff but seemed reasonable). regards, tom lane --

[BUGS] Please get me out of this ASAP

2006-02-08 Thread shyam nair
 My name is shyamkumar. Right now I am using Postgres as backend for development. And J2ee technology as front end. Now I have a situation like the sequence id is repeating. This applicaton is running  since from 1999, this is the first time we get such a result. I will give you more detail, 1. Thi