The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 2123
Logged by: Konstantin S. Zhinko [tIT]
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: 8.1.0
Operating system: CentOS 3.5
Description:join between stored procedures
Details:
Hi all!
I have a very big
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 2131
Logged by: kenichi nakanishi
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: 8.1.x Japanese
Operating system: Windows 2000 Professional Japanese
Description:SQL Query Bug ?
Details:
I found something
Thanks for your response.
Let me see if I understand this correctly. If the original query is an update and the instead rule replaces it with an update, then I should get a return status that is not zeros. And if the original query was an update and the instead rule replaced it with something
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 2129
Logged by: Akio Iwaasa
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: 7.4.10
Operating system: Redhat EL ES 3.0
Description:dblink problem
Details:
I'm very sorry for my poor English.
"postgres" pr
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 2133
Logged by: Guerra Antonio
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: 8.1.1
Operating system: windows xp professional edition
Description:can't reinstall postgresql
Details:
I installed postegres
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 2127
Logged by: Kyril Alyoshin
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: 8.0.3
Operating system: Windows XP
Description:Regular Expression Limits Do Not Work
Details:
I am writing a regex to verify
Tom Lane,
I have read the email you mailed me. And I have SELinux enabled in permissive mode and the testlibpq program can run. I am very happy. In the future, I will use the PostgreSQL and give up the MySQL and other databases. I think the PostgreSQL is better than the others.
Thank you ve
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 2126
Logged by: Grzegorz TaÅczyk
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: 8.1
Operating system: Slackware
Description:Index usage for function value
Details:
SELECT * FROM table WHERE id = myfunct
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 2128
Logged by: venkat
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: 8.1.1
Operating system: windows Xp service pack2
Description:unable to install win32 version of pgsql 8.1.1
Details:
unable to instal
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 2124
Logged by:
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: 8.1.1-1
Operating system: Windows
Description:Error "relation with OID ... does not exist" when using
temporary table in function.
Details:
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 2125
Logged by: Tony
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: 80100
Operating system: XP SP2
Description:SELECT problem with strings containing \
Details:
Hi,
Please refer to the DDL and data belo
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 2122
Logged by: David Wheeler
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: 8.1.0
Operating system: Mac OS X 10.4.3
Description:Inconsistent FK Error Messages
Details:
I noticed that when I update or in
Tom Lane,
I have read the email you mailed me yesterday. And I
have SELinux enabled in permissive mode and the
testlibpq program can run. I am very happy. In the
future, I will use the PostgreSQL and give up the
MySQL and other databases. I think the PostgreSQL is
better than the others.
Thank
"Konstantin S. Zhinko [tIT]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> SELECT b.*
> FROM get_obj_list a
> LEFT JOIN get_obj(a.id) b ON 1=1
> Error: relation "a" does not exists.
This is not a bug. You cannot make use of values from one inside the definition of another .
So the reference "a.id" is taken to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> In my case we have an unconditional instead rule. The original query was an
> update and the instead rule replaced it with an update of another table; an
> update was replaced with an update. Then I should expect to see the status
> of the last query that was insert
"Kyril Alyoshin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> IF (NEW.postal_code_name !~ '\\d{5}')
> The bug description is:
> If postal_code_name is > 5 digits, the expression would still evaluate to
> false, and the error will not be raised.
> Please correct this.
Please learn how to use regular expression
"Grzegorz TaÅczyk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> SELECT * FROM table WHERE id = myfunction('x', 10);
> There is an index created on id column, but query planner doesn't use it.
Have you declared myfunction as IMMUTABLE or STABLE? If it's volatile
then optimizing to an indexscan is incorrect and t
"Tony" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> When running a query such as:
> select folder from public.folders
> where lower(folder) like '%c:\\1%'
> no rows are returned
This is not a bug --- you've forgotten that backslash is an escape
character in LIKE patterns. You can either double it again:
See our FAQ about temporary tables:
4.19) Why do I get "relation with OID #
does not exist" errors when accessing temporary tables in PL/PgSQL
functions?
---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> The follow
On Mon, Dec 26, 2005 at 03:47:36PM +, kenichi nakanishi wrote:
> I found something strange result when using a following sql sentence,
> "select xxx || ' / ' || || ' / ' || as aaa from TABLE",
> sometime I could get empty results.
> When using same scentence on linux platform, I could
venkat wrote:
>
> The following bug has been logged online:
>
> Bug reference: 2128
> Logged by: venkat
> Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> PostgreSQL version: 8.1.1
> Operating system: windows Xp service pack2
> Description:unable to install win32 version of pgsql 8
We have significantly improved dblink since 7.4. Would you try 8.1 and
see if you can reproduce the problem?
---
Akio Iwaasa wrote:
>
> The following bug has been logged online:
>
> Bug reference: 2129
> Logged by:
22 matches
Mail list logo